I have to ask the obvious question here Gary - what if it were two women french kissing??
Hmm... are they naked or fully clothed?
Post some pictures... I'll let you know.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I have to ask the obvious question here Gary - what if it were two women french kissing??
Here's why your argument has no validity. It is not by choice, but by design. It is instinctual. That's why it is the norm, NOT because in your mind a higher percentage do it this way. When behavior is against the norm it is deviant. By definition, not opinion. Those who practice sexual behavior out side of the norm, heterosexual, are by definition, sexual deviants.
OK... I want to know who finds this guys butt tasty:
It certainly has validity to the people I know, and to the people who are homosexuals.
It isnt instinctual to have sex with a partner of the same sex? We factually stated earlier that it (homosexuality) is in the animal kingdom along with masturbating. To a homosexual, it is instinctive, not by choice. Regardless of what you may think, Jimmy doesnt one day say "hey, id really love to give John a bj"
Do you believe homosexuality is a learned trait or is genetic?
The norm is what we state is the norm based on a numerical value.
We factually stated earlier that it (homosexuality) is in the animal kingdom along with masturbating.
You never took logic in school, I must assume. Read your statement and the inference, then my response again. You wrote:
"I tend to think that an animal having a homosexual encounter is probably not smart enough to recognize that is what he is doing. That is presumeably not the case with humans."
Now go back and read my response, and the logical conclusion.
How many here have had a 3 some with 2 women and yourself? Was that "abnormal"? Who told you? You know someone I know? Look, I confess. I really didn't feel abnormal but I thought they were for suggesting it(sisters). Talk about 15minutes of glory, yoeweee, but I was studying sexuality, research you know. Now where were we...oh ya, don't need no kinky, pervy stuff in this country, it ain't right I tell ya.Actually a great q...
how many guys here dont like two women kissing? Ok for women on women at all? What about bisexual women? How many here have had a 3 some with 2 women and yourself? Was that "abnormal"?
Where is your "normal vs. abnormal" line?
I could get deep into sexuality with ya'll, being something I have somewhat studied and, well, immensely enjoy, but am sure it would go too far.
Where the heck is anyone on here who finds homosexuality fine and normal? No one? Im alone?
I posted a poll on another board I am on. Ill let ya know the results.
What about bisexual women?
How many here have had a 3 some with 2 women and yourself? Was that "abnormal"?
How many here have had a 3 some with 2 women and yourself? Was that "abnormal"?
Where is your "normal vs. abnormal" line?
....I could get deep into sexuality with ya'll,...
Sounds like you didn't do any research of your own. Just opinion. Or maybe you're Rick Astley...
p.s Wikipedia is for idiots and the illiterate.
I dont disagree with much you said, believe it or not. However, things like transgender operations and the resulting (and most likely pre-exisiting) psychological patterns have nothing to do with homosexuality.I think in the animal kingdom if a gay lion tried to hump a straight lion, the straight lions would eat the gay lion for dinner. I have no proof of that though... just a hunch.
Well... if it is wired different, then see my previous lion story.
I see some of this crap in the local school here. They make teachers go to classes about how some races are different than others and should be allowed to be disruptive and walk around and yell and interrupt because that's the way their culture is... I find that type of crap an excuse...
I worked at a company and had an employee (a male) want a sex change operation because he was "a woman trapped in a man's body." The deal was he wanted the health insurance to pay for it... So they chopped his wiener off... but before they did he was on hormones (or something) and it caused a big issue because he wanted to use the women's restroom and no woman was too thrilled with that. He ended up using the restroom across the street where his wife worked.
Flash forward a few years and the guy (or gal?) discovers he made a mistake... and he wants the insurance company to pay to put him back. Little did he realize, the doctor did NOT keep his pecker in a jar for use at a later time. Additionally, the insurance company would not pay to put him back (I guess they had a one-way trip policy). So he was going to sue the company to put him back because the company did not recognize his sickness and provide the proper care... It was the employers fault... So instead of a long battle, the company paid to put a new pecker on the guy... he is now short one toe BTW. I guess he can change his mind 9 more times and it will get progressively smaller.
Point is... he had a mental issue... he was wired "different"... and it was very disruptive to the employer.. My opinion is the dude should have been fired. He could go live with his dickless, wingless, and any other body part removed friends
My 2 cents.
No WE didn't. YOU did. Hardly makes it factual.
Bill, Seems to me you lost this debate about 3 pages ago. Its probably best to move on.
Well, I did at least learn that a double-negative produces a positive. But since you seem to be having trouble with it, I'll simplify it for you:
animal = not smart enough to recognize what he is doing
human = smart enough to recognize what he is doing
smart = NOT dumb (that's binary logic as I'm sure you are aware)