ClarkGriswold
Well-Known Member
- Jul 9, 2016
- 2,902
- Boat Info
- Sea Ray 370 Sundancer
- Engines
- Horizons
That’s the most fair representation I’ve heard or read.I think he says whatever he thinks will get him on TV and in the news.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That’s the most fair representation I’ve heard or read.I think he says whatever he thinks will get him on TV and in the news.
The Supreme Court reversed Chumps order.Trump fixed the border through executive order. Biden reversed them and invited all illegals to come. You can't be this stupid, can you?
You do realize that is a minimum number of challenges. In most normal cases, the jury pool is quite small and 10-20 can work without issue. This isn't a normal case. The Judge can allow more -- as it's his duty to ensure a fair trial.New York Consolidated Laws, Criminal Procedure Law - CPL § 270.25 Trial jury; peremptory challenge of an individual juror
Current as of January 01, 2021 | Updated by FindLaw Staff
1. A peremptory challenge is an objection to a prospective juror for which no reason need be assigned. Upon any peremptory challenge, the court must exclude the person challenged from service.
2. Each party must be allowed the following number of peremptory challenges:
(a) Twenty for the regular jurors if the highest crime charged is a class A felony, and two for each alternate juror to be selected.
(b) Fifteen for the regular jurors if the highest crime charged is a class B or class C felony, and two for each alternate juror to be selected.
(c) Ten for the regular jurors in all other cases, and two for each alternate juror to be selected.
3. When two or more defendants are tried jointly, the number of peremptory challenges prescribed in subdivision two is not multiplied by the number of defendants, but such defendants are to be treated as a single party. In any such case, a peremptory challenge by one or more defendants must be allowed if a majority of the defendants join in such challenge. Otherwise, it must be disallowed.
Not all of them. Biden undid the rest.The Supreme Court reversed Chumps order.
Neither side wants to fix illegal entry into the country but you could never agree or see that.Not all of them. Biden undid the rest.
Underestimated the prof. He can be.You can't be this stupid, can you?
Wrong again. It's one of the many differences between us. You are so blinded by TDS, you can only view things through that filter. I don't share your TDS and am free to call balls and strikes on both sides. But I also know it is a waste of my time to try to reason with you.Neither side wants to fix illegal entry into the country but you could never agree or see that.
Honestly, I haven't read enough about her judicial actions in the documents case to have an opinion. Based on their headlines, CNN thinks she does.Would you say she has a bias?
You never answered my question but you did go on another TDS rant, which is standard for you.Wrong again. It's one of the many differences between us. You are so blinded by TDS, you can only view things through that filter. I don't share your TDS and am free to call balls and strikes on both sides. But I also know it is a waste of my time to try to reason with you.
Underestimated the prof. He IS.
Did the GOP not put together a border Bill…
You are confused. You didn't ask me a question. You made a statement. You know those are different, right? See below:You never answered my question but you did go on another TDS rant, which is standard for you.
Did the GOP not put together a border Bill that Trump said to his followers vote it down don't make a border deal.
As I said neither side wants to try and solve the illegal entry issue at the border.
TDS rant? If that was a rant to you, you have some pretty thin skin. As to what Trump did or didn't do, the media wing of the democrat party says he intervened. If he did, it's a bad look.Neither side wants to fix illegal entry into the country but you could never agree or see that.
I don’t know if she does or not. The fact that Trump hasn’t complained about her seems telling…Honestly, I haven't read enough about her judicial actions in the documents case to have an opinion. Based on their headlines, CNN thinks she does.
I guess we'll find out. He is does have his hands full right now.I don’t know if she does or not. The fact that Trump hasn’t complained about her seems telling…
See again you didn't answer the question. What Bill has been passed by congress in the last 8 years to stop illegal entry into the country?You are confused. You didn't ask me a question. You made a statement. You know those are different, right? See below:
TDS rant? If that was a rant to you, you have some pretty thin skin. As to what Trump did or didn't do, the media wing of the democrat party says he intervened. If he did, it's a bad look.
You really have no self awareness. I mean, I see that in kids but not grown ass men.
Show me the question mark in this post that would indicate that a question was asked? And I did answer your non-question. My Mom is 88 and in the early stages of dementia. She has reading comprehension problems too. It's best to catch that condition early. Seriously.You never answered my question but you did go on another TDS rant, which is standard for you.
Did the GOP not put together a border Bill that Trump said to his followers vote it down don't make a border deal.
As I said neither side wants to try and solve the illegal entry issue at the border.
Which part of this doesn't answer your statement?As to what Trump did or didn't do, the media wing of the democrat party says he intervened. If he did, it's a bad look.
For the record, that bill would have allowed 5,000 illegals enter per day for a period of time before Biden needed to do anything. Not really "closing the boarder".“As the leader of our party, there is zero chance I will support this horrible, open borders betrayal of America. It’s not going to happen, and I’ll fight it all the way,” Trump said last month during a campaign event in Nevada. And he lavished praise on House Speaker Mike Johnson, who declared the bill “dead on arrival,” in the House.
No. A couple of people who claim the represent negotiated a bill that pretty much sucked. It continued to allow thousands in per day.You never answered my question but you did go on another TDS rant, which is standard for you.
Did the GOP not put together a border Bill that Trump said to his followers vote it down don't make a border deal.
As I said neither side wants to try and solve the illegal entry issue at the border.
You're a xenophobe.No. A couple of people who claim the represent negotiated a bill that pretty much sucked. It continued to allow thousands in per day.
Boarder bill is easy — build a fkg wall. Anything less is bullchit.