TRUMP 2024

highslice said:
Trump fixed the border through executive order. Biden reversed them and invited all illegals to come. You can't be this stupid, can you?
Click to expand...
The Supreme Court reversed Chumps order.
 
ClarkGriswold said:

New York Consolidated Laws, Criminal Procedure Law - CPL § 270.25 Trial jury;  peremptory challenge of an individual juror​

Current as of January 01, 2021 | Updated by FindLaw Staff
1. A peremptory challenge is an objection to a prospective juror for which no reason need be assigned.  Upon any peremptory challenge, the court must exclude the person challenged from service.
2. Each party must be allowed the following number of peremptory challenges:
(a) Twenty for the regular jurors if the highest crime charged is a class A felony, and two for each alternate juror to be selected.
(b) Fifteen for the regular jurors if the highest crime charged is a class B or class C felony, and two for each alternate juror to be selected.
(c) Ten for the regular jurors in all other cases, and two for each alternate juror to be selected.
3. When two or more defendants are tried jointly, the number of peremptory challenges prescribed in subdivision two is not multiplied by the number of defendants, but such defendants are to be treated as a single party.  In any such case, a peremptory challenge by one or more defendants must be allowed if a majority of the defendants join in such challenge.  Otherwise, it must be disallowed.
Click to expand...
You do realize that is a minimum number of challenges. In most normal cases, the jury pool is quite small and 10-20 can work without issue. This isn't a normal case. The Judge can allow more -- as it's his duty to ensure a fair trial.
 
highslice said:
Not all of them. Biden undid the rest.
Click to expand...
Neither side wants to fix illegal entry into the country but you could never agree or see that.
 
Iprof said:
Neither side wants to fix illegal entry into the country but you could never agree or see that.
Click to expand...
Wrong again. It's one of the many differences between us. You are so blinded by TDS, you can only view things through that filter. I don't share your TDS and am free to call balls and strikes on both sides. But I also know it is a waste of my time to try to reason with you.
 
highslice said:
Wrong again. It's one of the many differences between us. You are so blinded by TDS, you can only view things through that filter. I don't share your TDS and am free to call balls and strikes on both sides. But I also know it is a waste of my time to try to reason with you.
Click to expand...
You never answered my question but you did go on another TDS rant, which is standard for you.
Did the GOP not put together a border Bill that Trump said to his followers vote it down don't make a border deal.
As I said neither side wants to try and solve the illegal entry issue at the border.
 
1713390371787.png
 
Iprof said:
You never answered my question but you did go on another TDS rant, which is standard for you.
Did the GOP not put together a border Bill that Trump said to his followers vote it down don't make a border deal.
As I said neither side wants to try and solve the illegal entry issue at the border.
Click to expand...
You are confused. You didn't ask me a question. You made a statement. You know those are different, right? See below:
Iprof said:
Neither side wants to fix illegal entry into the country but you could never agree or see that.
Click to expand...
TDS rant? :D If that was a rant to you, you have some pretty thin skin. As to what Trump did or didn't do, the media wing of the democrat party says he intervened. If he did, it's a bad look.

You really have no self awareness. I mean, I see that in kids but not grown ass men.
 
highslice said:
Honestly, I haven't read enough about her judicial actions in the documents case to have an opinion. Based on their headlines, CNN thinks she does.
Click to expand...
I don’t know if she does or not. The fact that Trump hasn’t complained about her seems telling…
 
highslice said:
You are confused. You didn't ask me a question. You made a statement. You know those are different, right? See below:

TDS rant? :D If that was a rant to you, you have some pretty thin skin. As to what Trump did or didn't do, the media wing of the democrat party says he intervened. If he did, it's a bad look.

You really have no self awareness. I mean, I see that in kids but not grown ass men.
Click to expand...
See again you didn't answer the question. What Bill has been passed by congress in the last 8 years to stop illegal entry into the country?

Trump made a public statement that the Bill that the GOP and Dems settled on was bad and the Republicans needed to vote against it. Even people that worked on the Bill voted against it at Trumps orders.

“As the leader of our party, there is zero chance I will support this horrible, open borders betrayal of America. It’s not going to happen, and I’ll fight it all the way,” Trump said last month during a campaign event in Nevada. And he lavished praise on House Speaker Mike Johnson, who declared the bill “dead on arrival,” in the House.
 
Iprof said:
You never answered my question but you did go on another TDS rant, which is standard for you.
Did the GOP not put together a border Bill that Trump said to his followers vote it down don't make a border deal.
As I said neither side wants to try and solve the illegal entry issue at the border.
Click to expand...
Show me the question mark in this post that would indicate that a question was asked? And I did answer your non-question. My Mom is 88 and in the early stages of dementia. She has reading comprehension problems too. It's best to catch that condition early. Seriously.
highslice said:
As to what Trump did or didn't do, the media wing of the democrat party says he intervened. If he did, it's a bad look.
Click to expand...
Which part of this doesn't answer your statement?
 
Iprof said:
“As the leader of our party, there is zero chance I will support this horrible, open borders betrayal of America. It’s not going to happen, and I’ll fight it all the way,” Trump said last month during a campaign event in Nevada. And he lavished praise on House Speaker Mike Johnson, who declared the bill “dead on arrival,” in the House.
Click to expand...
For the record, that bill would have allowed 5,000 illegals enter per day for a period of time before Biden needed to do anything. Not really "closing the boarder".
 
Iprof said:
You never answered my question but you did go on another TDS rant, which is standard for you.
Did the GOP not put together a border Bill that Trump said to his followers vote it down don't make a border deal.
As I said neither side wants to try and solve the illegal entry issue at the border.
Click to expand...
No. A couple of people who claim the represent negotiated a bill that pretty much sucked. It continued to allow thousands in per day.

Boarder bill is easy — build a fkg wall. Anything less is bullchit.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
113,208
Messages
1,428,592
Members
61,109
Latest member
Minnervos
Back
Top