Omicron, the sequel

Screenshot_20220222-180053_DuckDuckGo.jpg
Screenshot_20220222-180112_DuckDuckGo.jpg
 
MonacoMike said:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...vids-spike-protein-linked-Moderna-patent.html

The dirt just keeps coming out. Can’t wait to hear the apologists excuses for the one in three trillion odds of this occurring naturally.

It becomes clearer and clearer this whole thing was a crime against humanity…
Click to expand...
Excuses:
"Professor Lawrence Young, a virologist at Warwick University, admitted the latest finding was interesting but claimed it was not significant enough to suggest lab manipulation.
He told MailOnline: 'We're talking about a very, very, very small piece made up of 19 nucleotides.
'So it doesn't mean very much to be frank, if you do these types of searches you can always find matches.
'Sometimes these things happen fortuitously, sometimes it's the result of convergent evolution (when organisms evolve independently to have similar traits to adapt to their environment).
'It's a quirky observation but I wouldn't call it a smoking gun because it's too small.
He added: 'It doesn't get us any further with the debate about whether Covid was engineered.'
Dr Simon Clarke, a microbiologist at Reading University, questioned whether the find was as rare as the study claims.
He told MailOnline: 'There can only be a certain number of [genetic combinations within] furin cleavage sites.
'They function like a lock and key in the cell, and the two only fit together in a limited number of combinations.
'So it's an interesting coincidence but this is surely entirely coincidental.' "

Source: Your article.
 
alnav said:
Excuses:
"Professor Lawrence Young, a virologist at Warwick University, admitted the latest finding was interesting but claimed it was not significant enough to suggest lab manipulation.
He told MailOnline: 'We're talking about a very, very, very small piece made up of 19 nucleotides.
'So it doesn't mean very much to be frank, if you do these types of searches you can always find matches.
'Sometimes these things happen fortuitously, sometimes it's the result of convergent evolution (when organisms evolve independently to have similar traits to adapt to their environment).
'It's a quirky observation but I wouldn't call it a smoking gun because it's too small.
He added: 'It doesn't get us any further with the debate about whether Covid was engineered.'
Dr Simon Clarke, a microbiologist at Reading University, questioned whether the find was as rare as the study claims.
He told MailOnline: 'There can only be a certain number of [genetic combinations within] furin cleavage sites.
'They function like a lock and key in the cell, and the two only fit together in a limited number of combinations.
'So it's an interesting coincidence but this is surely entirely coincidental.' "

Source: Your article.
Click to expand...


So if an exact duplication of a paragraph of a Tom Clancy novel ends up in my book it is just a coincidence? Bull Sheet…
 
Was talking to an internist I have known for many years yesterday. I commented that she must not be seeing many really sick Covid patients with the big decline in cases. On the contrary she said. We are still very busy with critical patients who have not been vaccinated.
 
Honest question, where is fauci? For 2 years that dickwad has been in front of a camera for every waking second.
In case nobody has noticed, mask mandates and vax passports are dropping like flys, and that is in deep blue cities and states.
 
The "lab leak" theory seems to always talk about whether the virus was engineered or not. Being engineered does not mean it didn't come from the lab or not. There is little doubt to me the naturally occurring virus could have been studied in the lab and the release , either accidentally or purposely, was from the lab. Studying naturally occurring viruses is what a virology lab would do, no?
 
It’s already been established this was not only engineered but a number of patents have existed for years.
 
spikedaddy99 said:
The "lab leak" theory seems to always talk about whether the virus was engineered or not. Being engineered does not mean it didn't come from the lab or not. There is little doubt to me the naturally occurring virus could have been studied in the lab and the release , either accidentally or purposely, was from the lab. Studying naturally occurring viruses is what a virology lab would do, no?
Click to expand...

The "lab leak" theory is precisely because there is no DNA match in nature for the way this virus functions. (Please excuse me as I am not a scientist and may not use the perfectly precise words.) There was recent reporting from Europe that there was a snippet (I hate that word, because it minimizes this to the masses) of DNA that was an exact match to a 2016 Moderna patent DNA. Some here scoffed that it was such a small amount but if I plagiarized a paragraph from a Clancy novel would anyone buy the excuse it was a small amount? The scientists from Europe say it is a one in three trillion chance of this occurring naturally...
 
MonacoMike said:
The "lab leak" theory is precisely because there is no DNA match in nature for the way this virus functions. (Please excuse me as I am not a scientist and may not use the perfectly precise words.) There was recent reporting from Europe that there was a snippet (I hate that word, because it minimizes this to the masses) of DNA that was an exact match to a 2016 Moderna patent DNA. Some here scoffed that it was such a small amount but if I plagiarized a paragraph from a Clancy novel would anyone buy the excuse it was a small amount? The scientists from Europe say it is a one in three trillion chance of this occurring naturally...
Click to expand...

Youre far more patient than I.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
113,218
Messages
1,428,820
Members
61,115
Latest member
Gardnersf
Back
Top