mrsrobinson
Well-Known Member
I was never coached, trained or mentored to "cheat, slight, and/or underpay somebody along the way". For a claim like this one we had to set initial reserves on what we thought the claim payout would eventually be, in most cases leadership would ask us to raise those reserves. I paid out multi million dollar claims too. Sadly, once they hire an attorney, the insurance has to as well, costs go up, which trickle down to your overall insurance costs.I am very happy for you, that is what your experience leads you to believe.
I'm guessing that things have changed since you were two yrs out of college, as the entire industry now seems to revolve around dodging Liability. Go back far enough, and everybody pretty much honored what was 'fair and reasonable'.
That seems to be gone with the wind, much like Common Sense.
It would be quite foolish to overlook the fact that the Ins Companies report to stock holders, and by necessity pay out BIG claims at times. The only way they are able to do this is to cheat, slight, and/or underpay somebody along the way. As a casual observer it looks to me like those people are the ones that are 'under represented' (a radical understatement). Anybody is more than welcome to dispute that premise at their own peril.
Like PG, I would much rather opt to make every possible effort to avoid anything involving lawyers.
Still, there are times when it is the prudent thing to do whether we like it or not.
They may well take a third, but that is their incentive to increase the number,
which ultimately is for your long term benefit and well being.
Their 'number' is irrelevant in the big picture, and not worth getting a heart-burn over.
The "extra" money anyone gets, from my experience, goes to the attorney, not you. And in most cases you lose money because you pay the attorney from the proceeds. And once you hire an attorney you can no longer communicate directly with the insurance company. An example: at fault auto accident, set medical reserves at $25k, pain and suffering settlement reserve at $60k, total reserve $85k. Claimant hires an attorney and we settled at, you guessed it, $60k and we paid all of the medical bills. Claimant lost 33% of $60 to pay the attorney. NEVER made sense to me.
In my ex-wife case we ONLY hired an attorney because the driver that hit her did not have insurance and he was disputing the red light, trying to say it was green for him. The attorney was able to find insurance we were not aware of (our uninsured motorist coverage), got everything paid, then took his 1/3.
@Pirate Lady sit tight, get your wife better, get a replacement car, etc. focus on that. If the other drivers insurance company has accepted liability and is paying the claim, let them pay, including a rental car no now if you need one. Don't rush out to get an attorney. Don't be greedy either, there are laws that protect you, you don't need an attorney for everything. Regarding greedy it was common for folks to dispute the value of their car when it was a total loss (which yours obviously is) . The #'s the Insurance company will give are backed by data. Because a car was so special to the owner and they changed the oil regularly and took it to the car wash monthly, doesn't make it more valuable.