rondds
Well-Known Member
- Oct 3, 2006
- 8,859
- Boat Info
- 2001 380DA
- Engines
- Merc 8.1s (2008)...Hurth ZF 63 V-drives...WB 7.0 BCGD (2013), Garmin 8208 & 740 MFDs, GMR 24xHD dome
the stubby early searay foray into bridge boat building guy chiming in here :wink:
firstly, i read the review in Boating Mag and they liked the boat. on the other hand they never really dislike any boat (b/c they are given test boats and do not want to trash any builder b/c they may not be given any more. i was surprised they were given a gasser to test by searay, but they felt that the 8.1s were a nice choice and diesel was not a must-have in this boat. whether that recommendation was programmed by brunswick, we'll never know. but i DO know that every test i have ever read in Boating in the 10 years i have been getting it, always featured a the boat powered by the mid to highest engine option offered.
in looking at the numbers their fuel consumption tests rendered, i'd say they are comparable to mine , but my boat is about 6000lbs lighter and runs carbuerated 7.4s. dont get hung up on comparing these consumption numbers with those of a 380DA. Dancers are lighter and narrower and will always be more economical than a bridge boat. not to mention that the weight distribution is more aft with a sedan bridge, which makes planing more strenuous and thus lowers your cruising speed and MPG.
as far as being more unstable, i think it depends on where you are sitting. if you sat on a chair perched on top of the radar arch of a comparably sized sundancer, you will get the same amount of movement, just by simple geometry. the further from the fulcrum, the more the point moves. it's annoying but it is not unsafe. while your body may move more measurably, i think it affects you less (from a motion sickness standpoint) b/c you are able to look out further on the horizon and not see the movement of the water itself.
WITHOUT A DOUBT, you are more at the mercy of the wind when docking than with ANY express-type boat. wind has kept us at the dock several times just b/c i was concerned about getting back in (no bow thruster). anyone with a gas powered inboard searay knows what a "thrill" it is maneuvering his/her boat in close-quarters. that is magnified both by the increased weight and the wind resistance bridge boats present.
as for the new 36, i think it is a beauty. that being said, i'm not crazy about a one stateroom design. even my old 340 (which is 2' shorter at the water line) has a second room, without sacrificing a stall shower (be envious dancer owners!) :smt038 . to me that is important, and it could be at resale time since many a prospective buyer will have the proverbial 2.4 children. interestingly , my boat was only made in 88 and 89. probably not a hot seller but there are always a handful to be had on boats.com. but the 88 had galley down and one stateroom, while in the 89 they switched to galley up and two staterooms.
then there's the whole debate of being isolated from your guests, blah blah. forget that. the bridge is so large and the cockpit so small, no one is going to sit back there. you will not be alone. being up there CAN BE a consideration when docking since you are fairly helpless way up in the sky.
firstly, i read the review in Boating Mag and they liked the boat. on the other hand they never really dislike any boat (b/c they are given test boats and do not want to trash any builder b/c they may not be given any more. i was surprised they were given a gasser to test by searay, but they felt that the 8.1s were a nice choice and diesel was not a must-have in this boat. whether that recommendation was programmed by brunswick, we'll never know. but i DO know that every test i have ever read in Boating in the 10 years i have been getting it, always featured a the boat powered by the mid to highest engine option offered.
in looking at the numbers their fuel consumption tests rendered, i'd say they are comparable to mine , but my boat is about 6000lbs lighter and runs carbuerated 7.4s. dont get hung up on comparing these consumption numbers with those of a 380DA. Dancers are lighter and narrower and will always be more economical than a bridge boat. not to mention that the weight distribution is more aft with a sedan bridge, which makes planing more strenuous and thus lowers your cruising speed and MPG.
as far as being more unstable, i think it depends on where you are sitting. if you sat on a chair perched on top of the radar arch of a comparably sized sundancer, you will get the same amount of movement, just by simple geometry. the further from the fulcrum, the more the point moves. it's annoying but it is not unsafe. while your body may move more measurably, i think it affects you less (from a motion sickness standpoint) b/c you are able to look out further on the horizon and not see the movement of the water itself.
WITHOUT A DOUBT, you are more at the mercy of the wind when docking than with ANY express-type boat. wind has kept us at the dock several times just b/c i was concerned about getting back in (no bow thruster). anyone with a gas powered inboard searay knows what a "thrill" it is maneuvering his/her boat in close-quarters. that is magnified both by the increased weight and the wind resistance bridge boats present.
as for the new 36, i think it is a beauty. that being said, i'm not crazy about a one stateroom design. even my old 340 (which is 2' shorter at the water line) has a second room, without sacrificing a stall shower (be envious dancer owners!) :smt038 . to me that is important, and it could be at resale time since many a prospective buyer will have the proverbial 2.4 children. interestingly , my boat was only made in 88 and 89. probably not a hot seller but there are always a handful to be had on boats.com. but the 88 had galley down and one stateroom, while in the 89 they switched to galley up and two staterooms.
then there's the whole debate of being isolated from your guests, blah blah. forget that. the bridge is so large and the cockpit so small, no one is going to sit back there. you will not be alone. being up there CAN BE a consideration when docking since you are fairly helpless way up in the sky.