TRUMP 2024

highslice said:
For the record, that bill would have allowed 5,000 illegals enter per day for a period of time before Biden needed to do anything. Not really "closing the boarder".
Click to expand...
No it would have allowed the processing of asylum seekers with a max to process 5000 a day. More judges, more border patrol officers, helicopters and a faster process to deport applicants that are rejected.

Again I ask you what Bill has been pasted in the last 8 years on border security?
 
Golfman25 said:
No. A couple of people who claim the represent negotiated a bill that pretty much sucked. It continued to allow thousands in per day.

Boarder bill is easy — build a fkg wall. Anything less is bullchit.
Click to expand...
A wall won't do a thing, section of it keep falling down. They are also going over it.
It was a GOP bill that they were proud of said it was the toughest border bill ever but Chump knew if it passed it was a positive for Biden so he said don't vote for it. Even the ones that crafted it voted against it on Chumps orders.
 
Iprof said:
A wall won't do a thing, section of it keep falling down. They are also going over it.
It was a GOP bill that they were proud of said it was the toughest border bill ever but Chump knew if it passed it was a positive for Biden so he said don't vote for it. Even the ones that crafted it voted against it on Chumps orders.
Click to expand...
Right. Then explain to me why after Texas put up barriers, the illegal crossings reduced and the problems moved to California.
 
Golfman25 said:
Right. Then explain to me why after Texas put up barriers, the illegal crossings reduced and the problems moved to California.
Click to expand...
[sarcasm]
You must be mistaken, a wall can’t possibly work!
[\sarcasm]

It only works for Sleepys inauguration to keep out the 80ish million (HAHAHAHA) Bidet voters.
 
TimW said:
[sarcasm]
You must be mistaken, a wall can’t possibly work!
[\sarcasm]

It only works for Sleepys inauguration to keep out the 80ish million (HAHAHAHA) Bidet voters.
Click to expand...
Actually, it was 81,283,501.
 
TimW said:
Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and prove it.

If you’re truly that stupid, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
Click to expand...
You have a different count that’s been certified?
 
Iprof said:
No it would have allowed the processing of asylum seekers with a max to process 5000 a day. More judges, more border patrol officers, helicopters and a faster process to deport applicants that are rejected.

Again I ask you what Bill has been pasted in the last 8 years on border security?
Click to expand...
Oh, so you haven't heard? Everyone who comes to the border now is an asylum seeker. You should watch your party's propaganda more.

Finally, a question with a question mark and not a statement. There hasn't been one. It is possible that neither party wants to reform immigration. But what is happening now is aimed at keeping dems the ruling party permanently. We are way past any level of illegal immigration that has been experienced in past administrations. That is not a coincidence.
 
Iprof said:
A wall won't do a thing, section of it keep falling down. They are also going over it.
It was a GOP bill that they were proud of said it was the toughest border bill ever but Chump knew if it passed it was a positive for Biden so he said don't vote for it. Even the ones that crafted it voted against it on Chumps orders.
Click to expand...
Bush put up wall, vehicle barriers, pedestrian barriers...Obama did the same...even Biden has put up some. But if Trump does it he's a bad man, he's a racist, and walls don't work.

ICE arrests and Deportations under Trump were considered proof what a dirty bastard racist white supremacist he was. During Obama's years it's all cool and smooth just like Barry.:cool:

Tariffs are absolutely always wrong if Trump uses them but Biden kept some of them and he's doing nothing but good. Yup, so good he says he's going to put some more tariffs on steel.

Trump haters need to wake up

ice.JPG

Deportation.JPG
 
ClarkGriswold said:
Is he this ignorant? Lying? Both?
View attachment 162294
Click to expand...
ClarkGriswold said:
But they knew that going in. So he is lying to you all. Again.
Click to expand...
ClarkGriswold said:
You don’t have a problem with Cannon, right? Even though the defendant appointed her to her job?

The judge doesn’t decide how many “strikes” are given each side. NY state law does.
Click to expand...
ClarkGriswold said:

New York Consolidated Laws, Criminal Procedure Law - CPL § 270.25 Trial jury;  peremptory challenge of an individual juror​

Current as of January 01, 2021 | Updated by FindLaw Staff
1. A peremptory challenge is an objection to a prospective juror for which no reason need be assigned.  Upon any peremptory challenge, the court must exclude the person challenged from service.
2. Each party must be allowed the following number of peremptory challenges:
(a) Twenty for the regular jurors if the highest crime charged is a class A felony, and two for each alternate juror to be selected.
(b) Fifteen for the regular jurors if the highest crime charged is a class B or class C felony, and two for each alternate juror to be selected.
(c) Ten for the regular jurors in all other cases, and two for each alternate juror to be selected.
3. When two or more defendants are tried jointly, the number of peremptory challenges prescribed in subdivision two is not multiplied by the number of defendants, but such defendants are to be treated as a single party.  In any such case, a peremptory challenge by one or more defendants must be allowed if a majority of the defendants join in such challenge.  Otherwise, it must be disallowed.
Click to expand...
ClarkGriswold said:
I don't doubt that. I am just countering what Trump posted. If he didn't know the NY state law, he is either ignorant or lying. Again. And trying to wind up his supporters with false narratives. He is not being treated unfairly by the judge thus far.
Click to expand...
ClarkGriswold said:
Would you say she has a bias?
Click to expand...
ClarkGriswold said:
Then why does he do it? You know EXACTLY what he gains by lying...he winds up his supporters. Now they can hate the judge because poor Trump is being persecuted and not allowed to strike everyone from the jury that he wants to strike. That's the narrative he wants out there.
Click to expand...
ClarkGriswold said:
Huh. You all poo poo him when he warns us about a second Trump term but I am supposed to buy this? Which is it? Is he a RINO or not?
Click to expand...
It may be a time for some self reflection. Just sayin...
 
Woody said:
Bush put up wall, vehicle barriers, pedestrian barriers...Obama did the same...even Biden has put up some. But if Trump does it he's a bad man, he's a racist, and walls don't work.

ICE arrests and Deportations under Trump were considered proof what a dirty bastard racist white supremacist he was. During Obama's years it's all cool and smooth just like Barry.:cool:

Tariffs are absolutely always wrong if Trump uses them but Biden kept some of them and he's doing nothing but good. Yup, so good he says he's going to put some more tariffs on steel.

Trump haters need to wake up

View attachment 162317
View attachment 162318
Click to expand...
Well Barak was the Deporter in Chief.
 
Iprof said:
No it would have allowed the processing of asylum seekers with a max to process 5000 a day. More judges, more border patrol officers, helicopters and a faster process to deport applicants that are rejected.

Again I ask you what Bill has been pasted in the last 8 years on border security?
Click to expand...
Iprof said:
A wall won't do a thing, section of it keep falling down. They are also going over it.
It was a GOP bill that they were proud of said it was the toughest border bill ever but Chump knew if it passed it was a positive for Biden so he said don't vote for it. Even the ones that crafted it voted against it on Chumps orders.
Click to expand...
The Bill was not a good Bill, I'm glad Trump caught that.

The wall should be finished where terrain allows. Border Patrol should be patrolling the border not babysitting. Anyone entering/trying to enter between 'Ports of Entry' should be refused entry on the spot.

The message should be put out, 'Don't Come', we will not accept a flood of fake asylum seekers. Do you really think people that fly in from Europe and Asia to walk across our southern border are actual 'asylum seekers'?

We need to let in only the number we need. There's no obligation that we be a blotter that soaks up the worlds misery. We don't have to accept those that have no intention of assimilating... you know, like the ones that flip us the bird or chant 'Death to America'.

Look to western European countries for examples of the damage being done by the immigrants/refugees, legal and illegal.
 
Woody said:
The Bill was not a good Bill, I'm glad Trump caught that.

The wall should be finished where terrain allows. Border Patrol should be patrolling the border not babysitting. Anyone entering/trying to enter between 'Ports of Entry' should be refused entry on the spot.

The message should be put out, 'Don't Come', we will not accept a flood of fake asylum seekers. Do you really think people that fly in from Europe and Asia to walk across our southern border are actual 'asylum seekers'?

We need to let in only the number we need. There's no obligation that we be a blotter that soaks up the worlds misery. We don't have to accept those that have no intention of assimilating... you know, like the ones that flip us the bird or chant 'Death to America'.

Look to western European countries for examples of the damage being done by the immigrants/refugees, legal and illegal.
Click to expand...
Are you of Native American lineage?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
113,208
Messages
1,428,594
Members
61,109
Latest member
Minnervos
Back
Top