TRUMP 2024

Electing politicians because they lack spelling ability, just like the base, is a bad policy for a major party.
Btw, here in Mn we did that on the state level…that’s how we ended up with an imbecile like Jesse Ventura as Governor. Joe Six Pack liked that he talked like them. Rarely does that make for a successful executive.
 
Is it weaponizing of the justice system to investigate Eric Adams? Yes or no?
Like the Hillary and Hunter investigations, you have to see where it goes. They can be showing you the “illusion” of an investigation. Dudes like you fall for it.
 
Curious as to what you feel their intent was, in inflating or deflating values, if NOT financial gain of some sort? What would be the reasoning?

School me on the righteous nature of their actions.
Interesting that you can’t answer my simple question.

Why does there have to be any intent. Like I said before, values on these statements are guesses at best. Real value is set by willing buyers and sellers. A bank is not using a client produced financial value statement to make interest rate decisions. Their decision is based on the specific deal — the building at issue and the LTV. None of Trump‘s assets are restricted — he can get loans on them, sell them and spend the money on hookers and blow, they have zero value to the bank. If something happens to the original loan and it goes into default, the bank can sell the original building and then look to Trump for any outstanding balance. If he unloaded everything and blew all his money, it sucks for the bank.

You see those of us who fill these things out every year are very concerned. I have to “value” my business and real estate assets every year and submit to the banks. I don’t know what they are worth. It’s just a guess. Now I can be charged with fraud? That’s BS.
 
Interesting that you can’t answer my simple question.

Why does there have to be any intent. Like I said before, values on these statements are guesses at best. Real value is set by willing buyers and sellers. A bank is not using a client produced financial value statement to make interest rate decisions. Their decision is based on the specific deal — the building at issue and the LTV. None of Trump‘s assets are restricted — he can get loans on them, sell them and spend the money on hookers and blow, they have zero value to the bank. If something happens to the original loan and it goes into default, the bank can sell the original building and then look to Trump for any outstanding balance. If he unloaded everything and blew all his money, it sucks for the bank.

You see those of us who fill these things out every year are very concerned. I have to “value” my business and real estate assets every year and submit to the banks. I don’t know what they are worth. It’s just a guess. Now I can be charged with fraud? That’s BS.
My guess, giving you the benefit of the doubt, is that you aren’t submitting numbers with fraudulent intent. You are fine.

But if you truly believe that Trump wasn’t trying to game the system you are either stupid or naive. Likely both since you voted for him in the first place. “Dudes like you fall for it”.
 
Thank you to all you Vets out there today!

Of course your guy thinks you are all “suckers” and “losers” but those of us with a brain know better.
 
My guess, giving you the benefit of the doubt, is that you aren’t submitting numbers with fraudulent intent. You are fine.

But if you truly believe that Trump wasn’t trying to game the system you are either stupid or naive. Likely both since you voted for him in the first place. “Dudes like you fall for it”.
Great, I’m fine until I run for office and some rogue prosecutor comes after me for ”fraud.”

so once again I ask, please point me to the lender’s testimony that they would have charged a different Interest rate and their subsequent lawsuits to recover what the where defrauded of.
 
Great, I’m fine until I run for office and some rogue prosecutor comes after me for ”fraud.”

so once again I ask, please point me to the lender’s testimony that they would have charged a different Interest rate and their subsequent lawsuits to recover what the where defrauded of.
But Trump posted mean tweets.
 
meantweetd.png
 
Great, I’m fine until I run for office and some rogue prosecutor comes after me for ”fraud.”

so once again I ask, please point me to the lender’s testimony that they would have charged a different Interest rate and their subsequent lawsuits to recover what the where defrauded of.
Why would a “rogue” prosecutor care about you? That’s the question you’d be faced with asking yourself.
 
As hated as Dubya was by the left, don’t you find it odd he never had a “rogue prosecutor” situation, even once? They couldn’t make up “fake shit” on him????? Just on Trump. Weird, that.
 
As hated as Dubya was by the left, don’t you find it odd he never had a “rogue prosecutor” situation, even once? They couldn’t make up “fake shit” on him????? Just on Trump. Weird, that.
Dubya is part of the insiders club. Even the Clintons were scared of the Bush's
 
In 1969 Mar A Lago was declared a National Historical Landmark. Lots of luck knocking that down and putting condos up.

In 2002 the “ Deed of Development Rights” that Trump signed outlines that the Club and Trump intend to forever extinguish their right to develop or use the property for any purpose other than a social club.
Wrong again,

"Listing of private property as a National Historic Landmark or in the National Register does not prohibit under Federal law or regulations any actions which may otherwise be taken by the property owner with respect to the property."
The 2002 agreement Trump signed says you are 100% wrong. Trump had to be declared an employee that is needed on sight so he can live there.
When you put all the documents together Trump cannot change it back to a single family residence.
Mar a Lago was not declared a 'National Historical Landmark' in 1969, that designation happened 12/23/80. Scroll down the page here, you'll see when it was listed
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalhistoriclandmarks/list-of-nhls-by-state.htm

There is the National Park Service(NPS) 'National Historical Landmark' and 'National Register of Historic Places', being on/off those federal lists is voluntary and my statement applies to them.

The 2002 agreement was not made with the NPS. Those were made with 'The National Trust for Historic Preservation' a privately funded nonprofit organization.

When at their website I found their 'Worthless' disclaimer...

'Consolidated financial statements are presented for convenience and information purposes only, and while reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the integrity of such information, they should not be relied on. A copy of the printed (consolidated) financial statements will be provided on request.'

It's interesting this group, all well educated/sophisticated find this disclaimer has weight, even Trustee US AG Merrick Garland.;)
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,253
Messages
1,429,324
Members
61,129
Latest member
MinecraftRuSwilm
Back
Top