Having trouble understanding current events

First time I agree with a Dem

4904DE34-7076-433F-8FE6-09A9D0B37810.jpeg
 
To dumb it all down, here's where we're at...
“The hope is that liberals do not adopt the line that the classified documents in Biden’s garage, even though we don’t know what they are, are harmless, and the classified documents found at Mar-a-Lago, even though we don’t know what they are, are a grave threat to the nation.";)
 
I would argue that “dumbing things down” is exactly the problem since around 2015. Probably just coincidence.
 
I would argue that “dumbing things down” is exactly the problem since around 2015. Probably just coincidence.
Things started dumbing down in 2009 when everything bad that happened in the next 8 years was "the last guy's fault". The "beer summit" (dumb and divisive) and the great "If you own a bidness you didn' bild dat somebidy else bilt dat" (dumb, wrong and divisive) speech and on and on and on. The great divider.
 
Things started dumbing down in 2009 when everything bad that happened in the next 8 years was "the last guy's fault". The "beer summit" (dumb and divisive) and the great "If you own a bidness you didn' bild dat somebidy else bilt dat" (dumb, wrong and divisive) speech and on and on and on. The great divider.
Ah
 
“Trump’s comparison of his case with Bill Clinton’s sock drawer is not only incorrect, it is nonsensical. Here’s why.


The Presidential Records Act says presidential records belong to the government, not the individual who served as president.


Presidential records in general are those made by or for the president for use in official business. The statute contains detailed definitions of what is and is not a presidential record.


Bill Clinton’s recordings were from his own interviews, qualifying as diaries, which the Presidential Records Act says are not presidential records. No law precluded Clinton from keeping them.


Trump is charged not with violating the Presidential Records Act, but instead with violating the Espionage Act. The records Trump is alleged to have illegally retained are agency records, such as records of the CIA, NSA, and Department of Defense, not presidential records.


Moreover, these records are covered by the Espionage Act because of their content—information about the national defense, which could be used to the injury of the United States or advantage of a foreign nation—US nuclear program, military capabilities of US & allies, etc.


And Trump is being charged not only because he kept them, but because he obstructed the investigation and lied about what he still retained. This is evidence of consciousness of guilt. If he really believed he could keep them, he would not have needed to lie about it.” B. McQuade, U of Mich Law Professor

I am sure you all know the law better than she does, so break it down for me as a non-lawyer(didn’t even stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night…) What does she have wrong?
 
“Trump’s comparison of his case with Bill Clinton’s sock drawer is not only incorrect, it is nonsensical. Here’s why.


The Presidential Records Act says presidential records belong to the government, not the individual who served as president.


Presidential records in general are those made by or for the president for use in official business. The statute contains detailed definitions of what is and is not a presidential record.


Bill Clinton’s recordings were from his own interviews, qualifying as diaries, which the Presidential Records Act says are not presidential records. No law precluded Clinton from keeping them.


Trump is charged not with violating the Presidential Records Act, but instead with violating the Espionage Act. The records Trump is alleged to have illegally retained are agency records, such as records of the CIA, NSA, and Department of Defense, not presidential records.


Moreover, these records are covered by the Espionage Act because of their content—information about the national defense, which could be used to the injury of the United States or advantage of a foreign nation—US nuclear program, military capabilities of US & allies, etc.


And Trump is being charged not only because he kept them, but because he obstructed the investigation and lied about what he still retained. This is evidence of consciousness of guilt. If he really believed he could keep them, he would not have needed to lie about it.” B. McQuade, U of Mich Law Professor

I am sure you all know the law better than she does, so break it down for me as a non-lawyer(didn’t even stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night…) What does she have wrong?
Whatever, dullard.
 
I don't get it. He hires only the "best people" and then calls them idiots that are incompetent. And he hired them.
FywCb7WWIAAVBfp.jpeg
 
I don't get it. He hires only the "best people" and then calls them idiots that are incompetent. And he hired them.View attachment 146128
My apologies. Trump must have made that comment after he graduated in the top half of his class at Syracuse College of Law back in 1987.
 
I don't get it, this country is full of Grandmas that 50+ years ago led the way, rebelled, literally shed their restraints, and let them titties jiggle. What's so ground breaking about Kendal Jenner, them titties probably don't even jiggle.:rolleyes:
Lol….. who cares she is starting a trend…. Influencers are not all bad….. just the bud light ones

FD5A2012-5499-4B24-9BF6-9093ECFC3269.jpeg
 
My apologies. Trump must have made that comment after he graduated in the top half of his class at Syracuse College of Law back in 1987.
I’m just asking, who’s the imbecile that hired all these now “incompetent” people???

Ps Hunter is irrelevant to the question. If you answer to every FPOTUS critique is “Hunter…” you aren’t truly participating in the discussion in good faith. But you do you, kid.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,241
Messages
1,429,110
Members
61,122
Latest member
DddAae
Back
Top