Oh Oillie you like to try and spin this election and live in denial. You can split hairs all you but the facts have not changed since it was declared that Biden has 306 Electoral votes. Biden will be the next President and there is nothing your little cult can do to stop it.
Perhaps you could reread my post I said when Rudi Guiliani represents Trump in court.
You obviously don’t get it. Trump is obviously represented by counsel. But most of the court cases haven’t been filed by his representatives.
There you go putting words in my mouth, again. Do you purposely make stuff up? So, now you’ve bored me again... I’ll go play somewhere else. You can discuss the white supremest Proud Boys with the President Elect from the Office of the President Elect. Derp
You don't seem to understand that I am talking about Trumps cases and Rudy Guiliani.
Hey dullard your getting nasty well at least trying I agee go play with yourself some place else.
Here's an article that addresses non-polling metrics but also the post-election machinations:
And this leads us to the MSM, social media's role in the coverage of Pres Trump and his Team. Swing some votes, change the election outcome? You bet they did and it wasn't the product of fair and un-biased reporting.
I don't think the media coverage of the President's covid response made much difference one way or the other. The public's impression of President Trump's, at least with respect to the virus response was obtained easily enough just by watching his press conferences. I think he would have been much better off if he had allowed his task force to do the majority of the communication (which, BTW, is exactly what is happening now). Over and above that, simply comparing the raw numbers of the U.S. vs. the rest of the world wrt per capita cases and deaths leads would lead most to a conclusion that our response was lacking.
A legislative construct. Not In the Constitution.
True, but still a valid federal statute that governs how electoral votes are processed. To change that, Congress would need to pass a different law and that's not likely. I suppose the Supreme Court could also overturn it, but based on today's ruling and the importance SCOTUS placed on Safe Harbor in Bush v. Gore, I wouldn't bet on that happening either.
