Cummins 6c Aftercoolers, Take a Look!

Asureyez

New Member
Apr 22, 2007
1,535
Ft. Lauderdale, Fl.
Boat Info
Sea Ray 460 Sundancer Hardtop 2001 - SOLD
Engines
Cummins 450 Diesels
Okay all you cummins fans, you've heared about these rascals having a special place in every Cummins owners heart ... Well I'm no different. These aftercoolers are what gives the turbo the efficiency of the boost and they earn their pay, but they demand some attention. I gave them a look see 60 hours early and I was too late for the Port side.

From another board dealing with Cummins diesels in boats, one of the experts there has written up quite a bit on these and their care and feeding. Mine came off this past Saturday for routine tear down and clean up, as it's part of the 600 HR service relagated to Cummins dealers as being a maintenance item owners can not do for themselves.

I asked Sun Power for a price to remove Aftercoolers/HE/Oil coolers, send out for clean up with ultrsonic and reasemble and replace,. They said sure for a smooth $12K! No fooling, 2 men 40 hours @ 105 an hour for $8K in labor plus parts, 12K!!!! My response, NFW! I asked for a friend to pitch in and help me pull them as he'sd done this before. So Saturday morning we did it together in 2.5 hours. Removed, off the boat and in my truck!

Replace will take about twice the time because of aligning the hoses and setting the clamps and torqueing the retaining bolts etc. I figure 15 hours labor all in, plus radiator shop services @ $1,200 and new wet hoses and clamps and gaskets @ 1,000. All in $2,200 in parts and A case of very fine wine for my friend.

I've got pictures below of these aftercoolers after with 540 hours on them over 5 years. The expert from the OTHER board claims that because the units are originally assembled dry without any grease in the ends, there is a lot of corrosion to be encounted and recommends that the aftercoolers be removed at original delivery and reassmbled with lithium grease in the aluminium/bronze matings. My experience is he is correct. I have one cooler on life support and will take some extra hours on the bench to get a servicable unit back, all do to 2 bucks worth of missing grease!

A note on operating on these aftercoolers. ALL impeller debris winds up in the wet end of the aftercooler. There is a cavity in the end caps, but water pressure rams debris up onto the tubes where they become lodged in other debris and zinc waste. On one cooler I was loosing about 30% water flow due to debris closing off the tubes.

aWith respect to Zincs, these type zincs leave a mustard yellow crust-like by product in salt water. This builds up and restricts water flow and entraps other things like shells. I'm going to have to really make a point of fishing around in the bottom cap for debris every 100 hours or so, perhaps even removeing the top and bottom hoses and back flusing the unit into a bucket to help keep the wet end from collecting so much crud.

Also, on the outboard of the STB engine, Cummins routes the boosted air to the intake manifold. The air pipes are connected by high temp hoses with contant torque clamps. As we were pulling the hose from the air discharge side of STB cooler, the clamp simply slipped off and slid down the pipe on its own, all it needed was a nudge. This is why my STB engine has been having difficulty keeping up with the Port ... at high boost pressures I was loosing air right out the hose duwe to a lack of clamp pressure ... The Moral....

Those inaccessible back sides of the Cummins engines really do exist and need TLC. It takes a skinny 160 (or less) pound person to get back there and be able to perform routine tasks, but it must be done. I want to borrow one of Gary's boys every 6 months to re torque my hose clamps every year!
 
Wow... I'm surprised at the corrosion. The aftercoolers themselves don't look all the bad but the eating away of the aluminum is not good.
 
Invisable

Gary the eal killer was it was invisiable. When the cap popped off some of the aluminium went with it and I thought it was part of a gasket at first, but NOPE, it was the aluminium body flaking away ... the rest of the story is grease'm or weep.
 
you are right... I'm thinking of pulling these QSM-11's out and putting in 6 Horizon 8.1 gassers....
 
The aftercoolers on the QSM-11's are a very different design. The top to the whole aftercooler assembly comes off and the heat exchanger is completely exposed and just lifts out.

I had the complete aftercooler/radiator reservior off the port side engine (with a mechanics help) before my tirp this summer and the aftercooler looked new. I did flush it earlier in the year though but the mechanic told me I would be wasting my money taking them to a radiator shop as you could see right through all the fins. I guess getting them pressure tested is a good idea though.

Do you ever backflush your engines with Rydlime or anything? That doesn't help the corrosion though...
 
Four Suns said:
you are right... I'm thinking of pulling these QSM-11's out and putting in 6 Horizon 8.1 gassers....

I thought it was a reasonable question with no sarcasm. Can't think of a single item on any gas engine that even approaches the cost of those aftercoolers. Obviously no one expects that a boat your size could use gas engines, but it does touch on an interesting debate as to the whole gas/diesel/worth the out of pocket difference on those marginal size boats; 380DA, 400DA, 390MY etc. Anyway, not to sidetrack the thread, but seeing as how the original post mentioned the very high cost of this repair I see Alexs' question as germane.
 
I am at 350 hours and this spring upon inspection my aftercoolers looked like Gary's..new. I really think the variable is freshwater usage. My boat is operated 90% of the time in fresh water.

Hose clamps--yup, and on my boat the port outbarod side is toughest to get to. But they really need periodic attention.

Chad, great post and good work to really reduce the cost of this maintenance. Another example why this is the best forum for DIY ers.

Like Gary, Diesels are the only power option on my boat. My experience on the subject (gas 320, diesel 420) indicates that diesels are cheaper for me to run and maintain; but I am not at the 600 hour point yet. I am inclined to think that continued fresh water operation will reduce my cost over time.

Chad, was your 460 always in salt water before you bought her?

regards
Skip
 
I could see how Alex's question could come across as sarcastic -- but the truth is I was thinking the same thing.... Apples to oranges I guess...
 
Answer

Yes, the boat has only been in salt water.

On the cost of diesel maintenance. The issue has been recently exasperated by the local Cummins guys jacking their rates up almost 20% over a two year period, was $85 to now $105 an hour. They never show with the parts and have to make multiple trips back to the shop for "stuff". The guys are diligent and don't putz, but they are employees.

On my boat the time issue is caused by really cramped spaces. The diesels are huge and the ER has too little space to get around in. The outboard sides of the engines truly can only be accessed by small framed people who are highly agile (bendy). In part cost is caused by SR in that this 460 (and my 370) does not have a usable master hatch. we're dealing with 4' headroom, and a 2X4 access hatch and a 18"walk space inboard between engines. Most all work is a two man job, as once you get to the problem you need a working helper to give you tools, to hand parts, support parts while you work with one hand, and the help remove parts and tools from your position. You can not just bob and weave in this ER and there are never to be any pirouettes performed here! I accept that as much as half the cost of my hired maintenance is due to SR design decisions in this model's ER access.

But, that said, on my 1996 370 Dancer with Merc's those boys weren't labor cheap either ... nothing was serviceable by the owner, he**, even getting to the sea strainers was a half day "inch worm" job for me and forget about getting to the Genny to change an oil filter or belt. I had to hire everything done because I simply couldn't get to the work and if I did get to it I couldn't get back out.
 
Four Suns said:
you are right... I'm thinking of pulling these QSM-11's out and putting in 6 Horizon 8.1 gassers....

Yeah Better figure on six of them to replace your oil burners :lol:
 
gerryb said:
I could see how Alex's question could come across as sarcastic -- but the truth is I was thinking the same thing.... Apples to oranges I guess...

I am German, therfore sarcastic, cynical and generally disagreeable ... but my point is true. Diesels are expensive equipement and any replacement or repair will cost a multiple of what it would cost for a gasser. For me on a lake it begs the question if diesel is even valid, because in our local world selling a 41 foot gasser is still no problem. I still would like to go to diesels though ...
 
Other than having to replace the engine every 1000 hours or so, I guess gassers could be cheaper than diesel. This is like arguing why disposable paper plates are better than china... "You know how many paper plates I can buy for that one piece of china?!"
 
That's something you learn after you meet your future mother-in-law.
 
I have read this thread with a lot of interest since I am always trying to educate myself. The only diesel engine I ever owned was a Yanmar in my John Deere 850 tractor and aside from understanding the principle of how diesels work, my first hand knowledge is sorely lacking. I don't really want to hijack this thread but I would like to ask a couple of questions.

It appears the design of your turbochargers or turbo coolers Gary and Skip and the design of yours Chad are different.......correct? And is there an installation issue in your boat Chad which makes maintenance like this much more difficult than in Skip and Gary's boat? I only ask these questions because I am just now begining to understand some of the possible "hidden costs" of boat ownership especially with large boats.

And could one conclude that there is less maintenance cost exposure with certain components in certain models of diesel engines?
 
OK, what should I being doing (or paying someone to do) NOW to avoid/delay this fate?

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know, find the source of the loose nut in my bilge.. I mean what should I be doing besides that...
 
I'm going to ask a similar question as Tim's....is there anything us CAT owners need to be looking at with regard to the aftercoolers? BTW....where is my aftercooler?

Tim, you still didn't solve the loose nut mystery???
 
Dave,
Chad and I have the identical engines, so our aftercoolers are the same, as are the turbochargers--older style holset turbos with no wastegate. I have never been in the engine spaces of a 460DA, but it sounds like Chad's mains are a bitmore difficult to access than mine. I can get to the outboard side of the stbd main fairly easily--I spent a fair amount of time there replacing the raw water intake hose and the fresh water pump, servicing trim tab reservoir, etc.

I will defer to the experts on salt water operation, but I really think that salt vs fresh water creates the real maintenance challenge.

regards
Skip
 
Four Suns said:
Other than having to replace the engine every 1000 hours or so, I guess gassers could be cheaper than diesel. This is like arguing why disposable paper plates are better than china... "You know how many paper plates I can buy for that one piece of china?!"
I don't think 1000 hours is right, matter of fact I know well maintained gassers will last longer, but that's beside the point. Also, you can get two 8.1S long blocks for the price that was quoted for this aftercooler repair. Anway, all besides the point.
For an average use of 60 to 80 hours a season on a lake environment like ours, the question still begs itself if you can chose. Even if the diesel sells at the same price difference that you paid out after you're done, you need to figure the opportunity cost of the money you have in them. Just take an average of a net (after income taxes) 6% you can generate on a dollar invested in the market.
Further our lake supports a market for large gassers, because people can buy a bigger boat and not really have to face the steep fuel costs because there are relatively few hours that go on a boat on a lake.
Once you get beyond 40 foot or so, diesels are anyway the only choice. Dismissing gassers too fast, even in larger cruisers depending on how you run, is what I disagree with.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,350
Messages
1,430,878
Members
61,196
Latest member
Jpski
Back
Top