More undercover global warming pictures.

I should probably delete that response... a little long-winded and not appropriate for a boating site. Guess he pushed my buttons (That is probably a phrase from the "Jack" family).
 
Four Suns said:
I should probably delete that response... a little long-winded and not appropriate for a boating site. Guess he pushed my buttons (That is probably a phrase from the "Jack" family).
Click to expand...

What did you do with Gary?

The real Gary would never talk that way.
 
Even the father of "global warming" said.... whoaaa, not so fast

[video=youtube;SyUDGfCNC-k]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SyUDGfCNC-k[/video]
 
Turtlesboat said:
Even the father of "global warming" said.... whoaaa, not so fast
Click to expand...

Very interesting information given in the video that supports my thoughts. They are just that though, my thoughts.
Thanks for posting.
 
Here's a more in depth explanation of the financial influence pushing away from real science:

[video=youtube_share;YtevF4B4RtQ]http://youtu.be/YtevF4B4RtQ[/video]
 
sfergson727 said:
I've watched both of the videos in their entirety, and I challenge those who believe in global warming to do the same. If they still believe after watching the two videos with an open mind, then I'd like to hear a coherent argument as to why.
Click to expand...

+1
I'd like to thank OldSkool for getting this thread started, it pushed me to learn much more about the topic.
Watching many other video clips I have yet to find "a coherent argument" supporting GW. :huh:

Sharing another:

[video=youtube;7jzBWmpzifc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jzBWmpzifc[/video]
 
Last edited:
Here's a good site to sift through. lots of research, lots of data, lots of facts that shows how numbers are manipulated. that "jump" in temps in 1998... turns out that NOAA changed their temp system that year which changed their numbers. Then they built models on that "change". Anyway, it's a good read.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/
 
Thanks to all for posting both for an against. I'm reminded of a verse that says Iron Sharpens Iron. I am surprised at the few bits of information supplied in support of GW/CC though.

Gary's posts have been very informative and I have gained much from everyone's posts. When SRC questioned me it made me dig deeper to make sure I had it right. If I'm wrong then bring it with references to support the claim. I'm a big boy, I'll do the research and admit when I'm incorrect. (It wouldn't be the first time).

I did not expect the thread to get this deep but man it's been good. The video's are outstanding. I would like to see some in support of CC.
 
OldSkool said:
When SRC questioned me it made me dig deeper to make sure I had it right. If I'm wrong then bring it with references to support the claim. I'm a big boy, I'll do the research and admit when I'm incorrect. (It wouldn't be the first time).
Click to expand...

Well, in that case don't bring a Thesaurus to a Dictionary fight. :grin:

Theory: a coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/theory?s=t

Hypothesis: a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hypothesis?s=t
 
From your references.
Theory:
a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact. Synonyms: idea, notion hypothesis, postulate. Antonyms: practice, verification, corroboration, substantiation.
Hypothesis:
The complete definition:
a proposition, or set of propositions, set forth as an explanation for the occurrence of some specified group of phenomena, either asserted merely as a provisional conjecture to guide investigation(working hypothesis) or accepted as highly probable in the light of established facts.

I guess it just boils down to where you cut and paste from. I will give you that I should have used working hypothesis to guide in the investigation process. Also the corresponding entries would lead one to accept that a hypothesis is a general guess and not the actual experimentation to support a conclusion.

Well done.
 
The truth is, when confronted by facts, all the global warmists have is dogma, belief in that it's real because someone said its real.
 
Turtlesboat said:
The truth is, when confronted by facts, all the global warmists have is dogma, belief in that it's real because someone said its real.
Click to expand...

Kinda like religion then.
 
Maybe it will warm yet but then it'll cool, temps go up and down you know...very scientific observation made by me. Man for some reason acts as if he'll be here a long time, the reality is we are it...all the other homos have lived and died. Specie sapien will be another one that's short lived...the earth on the other hand will continue on for a while. It would be interesting to see what type of life evolves after we're gone. In the years after us, when the containment of all our radioactive and biological garbage is compromised who knows what kind of interesting mutations there might be.

So if you guys had to choose, what would you want...warming or ice age...I'd take warming.
 
we don't have a choice, the planet will do what it wants to do. We're just along for the ride.
 
We will exist like all before and all after. When we are gone then what difference does it make? Lake Erie was a dead lake at one time now it thrives again. Science broke it then science fixed it. My faith system tell me one thing yours tells you something else on how this deal will end.

I love these pinheads that predict the end and the means by which it will happen.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
113,193
Messages
1,428,280
Members
61,104
Latest member
Three Amigos
Back
Top