brewster16
Well-Known Member
Yes, the old FC KerbeckIs that the old Kerbeck? Or are there 2 Atlantic City Chevy dealers. I flew up to Kerbeck to buy C6 convertible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes, the old FC KerbeckIs that the old Kerbeck? Or are there 2 Atlantic City Chevy dealers. I flew up to Kerbeck to buy C6 convertible.
Not so fast Henry Boyd.
"Overall, General Motors (GM)’s products racked up the highest domestic content score with 70.6 percent of the components making up its vehicles assembled in the U.S. - up from 70 percent last year and 58.2 percent across all models (those made in any country). Ford's domestic content increased from 70 percent to 67.6 percent for its U.S.-produced vehicles compared to 55 percent across its entire lineup. At FCA (Fiat Chrysler Automobiles), the percentage remained virtually unchanged with 64.1 percent interior content for U.S.-assembled vehicles and 55 percent for all other products."
https://www.auto123.com/en/news/vehicles-most-american-content-2020/67416/#:~:text=Overall, General Motors (GM),those made in any country).
Not only that, but car dealerships are mostly locally owned and employ lots of Americans in high paying jobs. The brand is mostly secondary when it comes to where the money goes when it comes to service and support. The people who do the ongoing work on your car and see that you have the parts you need shop in your town, not Germany or Japan.Interesting outlook. You do know profits go to stockholders right? One can own GM stock as easily as Volkswagen, and soon Porsche, regardless of country. That with the amount of overseas content, sources, and production (BMWs built in the US, for example) makes the notion of an “American” or, “German” car kind of nebulous.
Not only that, but car dealerships are mostly locally owned and employ lots of Americans in high paying jobs. The brand is mostly secondary when it comes to where the money goes when it comes to service and support. The people who do the ongoing work on your car and see that you have the parts you need shop in your town, not Germany or Japan.
AND by having the German, Japanese, and Korean made cars competing in quality with the Big 3, it makes the American car makers focus on quality.
I recall the absolute American junk of the 70’s until the Toyotas, Datsuns, and Hondas started stealing away car buyers.
I stopped buying American junk years ago….. back then my wife was in love with suburbans. We flipped them every year with her GM discount….. we swapped new engines for a couple years, a trani and one year a rear end….. then enough …..the discount wasn’t worth the painIt wasn’t just the 70s. In September 99 I bought a new Silverado with all the bells & whistles. In January 00 my wife bought an Audi A6 that was equally embellished. Both cost the same at just under $50k. In 07 I was able to convince a dealer to accept the Silverado as a trade on a newer model. By that time the body was rusting out (rockers were almost completely gone & GM no rust warranty worthless), the brake lines had rotted out in several spots and failed in service twice. The rear brake pads were only lasting 9 months between changes, after having replaced both rotors and calipers twice. The Audi on the other hand my wife drove for another ten years to 175k, only had to replace brake pads and rotors twice and never had a brake failure and body showed no sign of rust. Draw your own conclusions, both cost the same, both lived in the same environment. Both had normal service schedules followed as well as replacement of normal wear items.
It was the warped rotors and other minor issues with GM cars that caused me to switch to Japanese and German brands. Rotors were shot by 18,000 miles along with the cruise controls that would fail at around 21,000 miles. Had a transmission fail on a Toronado that was 800 miles beyond warranty in two years with no support from the company. These happened on cars that I traded every two years with just 50,000 miles on them. Nothing too major, but the hassle factor and depreciation finally got to me. After the switch it was oil changes and rotate the tires. That was about it. Even the tires still looked great at 50,000 miles.It wasn’t just the 70s. In September 99 I bought a new Silverado with all the bells & whistles. In January 00 my wife bought an Audi A6 that was equally embellished. Both cost the same at just under $50k. In 07 I was able to convince a dealer to accept the Silverado as a trade on a newer model. By that time the body was rusting out (rockers were almost completely gone & GM no rust warranty worthless), the brake lines had rotted out in several spots and failed in service twice. The rear brake pads were only lasting 9 months between changes, after having replaced both rotors and calipers twice. The Audi on the other hand my wife drove for another ten years to 175k, only had to replace brake pads and rotors twice and never had a brake failure and body showed no sign of rust. Draw your own conclusions, both cost the same, both lived in the same environment. Both had normal service schedules followed as well as replacement of normal wear items.
Your chart looks reasonable to me, but I wonder.I hear/read about how great the Jap cars dependability is and then I drive by Honda, Toyota, whatever dealerships and the service lots are full of cars waiting for what? Oil changes? I don't think so..... And there's this.... View attachment 135795
Your chart looks reasonable to me, but I wonder.
The other day I saw a similar 2022 chart and the Koreans hit the top of the chart.
I wonder which chart was correct?
Look at the title of the chart. It's about INITAL quality. This data is about how things look when the vehicle leaves the show room. My issue with GM is the lack of durability at 18,000 plus miles. My experience with initial quality of GM cars was pretty good. Also have had no initial quality issues with Honda, Porsche and Audi. Most of these have had zero warranty claims over the years of ownership.Your chart looks reasonable to me, but I wonder.
The other day I saw a similar 2022 chart and the Koreans hit the top of the chart.
I wonder which chart was correct?
Ok, here's 3 years of ownership.....Look at the title of the chart. It's about INITAL quality. This data is about how things look when the vehicle leaves the show room. My issue with GM is the lack of durability at 18,000 plus miles. My experience with initial quality of GM cars was pretty good. Also have had no initial quality issues with Honda, Porsche and Audi. Most of these have had zero warranty claims over the years of ownership.
Buick surprises me.Ok, here's 3 years of ownership..... View attachment 135833