TRUMP 2024

[ClarkGriswold]

PROSECUTION: “Is that true, Mr. Pecker, that your purpose in locking up the Karen McDougal story, was to influence the election?”

PECKER: “Yes”

The prosecution emphasizing for the jury that AMI agreed for purposes of the conciliation agreement that the McDougal payment constituted an unlawful corporate, in-kind contribution in violation of federal election law.

 

[highslice]

You don't find it troubling that their position is that it's an "official" act to take out a political opponent????

I don't see the word "political' in that quote. I didn't hear it live either.

 

[highslice]

PROSECUTION: “Is that true, Mr. Pecker, that your purpose in locking up the Karen McDougal story, was to influence the election?”

It needs to be Trump's purpose. But even if it was, what crime is being committed in New York? Bragg doesn't have jurisdiction over federal law and the feds already determined there was no violation of federal election laws.

 

[OllieC]

It needs to be Trump's purpose. But even if it was, what crime is being committed in New York? Bragg doesn't have jurisdiction over federal law and the feds already determined there was no violation of federal election laws.

This

 

[Golfman25]

PROSECUTION: “Is that true, Mr. Pecker, that your purpose in locking up the Karen McDougal story, was to influence the election?”

PECKER: “Yes”

The prosecution emphasizing for the jury that AMI agreed for purposes of the conciliation agreement that the McDougal payment constituted an unlawful corporate, in-kind contribution in violation of federal election law.

So Mr. Pecker you have an agreement with the DA to testify today, correct?

Yes

And in return for your testimony, the DA has agreed not to prosecute you, correct?

Yes.

And if your testimony doesn’t match what the DA wants, the agreement will be null and void and you’ll be subject to prosecution, correct?

Well I’m telling the truth.

It is possible that President Trump had a motivation to kill the story other then the election, correct?

Yes.

Like not to harm his family, or his celebrity status, or many others correct?

Yes.

Your honor, I finished with this guy.

 

[ClarkGriswold]

And how many of them were running for president?

No, you HOPE my interpretation is wrong. Also you and the canadian little @Iprof don't mention that the Pecker said he has done catch and kill for 100s of celebrities that want to maintain their reputations the same way Trump wanted to maintain his.

STEINGLASS: During your tenure at AMI, 100s of 1000s of NDA, right?
PECKER: Yes.
STEINGLASS: How many did you coordinate with a presidential candidate for benefit of campaign
PECKER: “It’s the only one.”

 

[ClarkGriswold]

So Mr. Pecker you have an agreement with the DA to testify today, correct?

Yes

And in return for your testimony, the DA has agreed not to prosecute you, correct?

Yes.

And if your testimony doesn’t match what the DA wants, the agreement will be null and void and you’ll be subject to prosecution, correct?

Well I’m telling the truth.

It is possible that President Trump had a motivation to kill the story other then the election, correct?

Yes.

Like not to harm his family, or his celebrity status, or many others correct?

Yes.

Your honor, I finished with this guy.

Of course. There is ZERO chance Trump has done anything wrong. Ever. Right?

You should maybe get on his defense team. I think you believe that shit more than they do!

Get paid upfront, would be my advice.

 

[Woody]

Of course. There is ZERO chance Trump has done anything wrong. Ever. Right?

You should maybe get on his defense team. I think you believe that shit more than they do!

Get paid upfront, would be my advice.

Not relevant.

 

[Golfman25]

Of course. There is ZERO chance Trump has done anything wrong. Ever. Right?

You should maybe get on his defense team. I think you believe that shit more than they do!

Get paid upfront, would be my advice.

You're right. The walls are closing in. They got him now.

 

[highslice]

And if your testimony doesn’t match what the DA wants, the agreement will be null and void and you’ll be subject to prosecution, correct?

But that's not undue influence....

 

[highslice]

STEINGLASS: How many did you coordinate with a presidential candidate for benefit of campaign

They have to establish that it was solely to benefit the campaign. Haven't seen that done yet.

 

[ClarkGriswold]

 

[Iprof]

You're right. The walls are closing in. They got him now.

Yup got him for 355 million. Got him for 18 million. Got him for 83 million and NY state has him on a criminal trial.

 

[Iprof]

You're right. The walls are closing in. They got him now.

Yup they have Pecker testify against him.
They have Chumps personal assistant testify against him.
They have a banker testify in the money trail.
And so much more to come.

 

[RichieRitz]

CNN, the left of the left, home base of the ‘tard hive.




So, you’re self admittedly a socialist.

Got it.

You’re in favor of .gov running your life.

Fuck off, the .gov works FOR us NOT Us for them as you’d like.

Dumber than dumb. Social democracy is exactly the government working for the benefit of society (as well as corporations doing the same btw) You should read more. Your ignorance is painful to watch.

 

[Golfman25]

Dumber than dumb. Social democracy is exactly the government working for the benefit of society (as well as corporations doing the same btw) You should read more. Your ignorance is painful to watch.

Venezuela says hi.

 

[TimW]

Dumber than dumb. Social democracy is exactly the government working for the benefit of society (as well as corporations doing the same btw) You should read more. Your ignorance is painful to watch.

Stop looking in a mirror, dumbass.

Go find Iidiot, Dildorude, and your other buddies and form your circle.

 

[highslice]

Yup they have Pecker testify against him.
They have Chumps personal assistant testify against him.
They have a banker testify in the money trail.
And so much more to come.

Oh, but if any of it was illegal. Too bad for you.