Shaft replacement and engine alignment 400 DA

peterkvs

Active Member
Nov 11, 2012
511
Guntersville, Alabama
Boat Info
400 Sundancer 1999
Engines
3116 Cats, 1000 hours
A couple months ago I posted that I had hit a submerged object and bent something. The post was http://clubsearay.com/showthread.php/64754-Hit-a-submerged-object-bad-vidration-now-what-to-do?highlight= Since then I have been working on the boat and finally gotten the problem fixed. Here is the story...

I pulled the boat out of the water and removed both props and both shafts. I noted that the shaft zinc anode on the starboard shaft was jammed into the strut and was still tight on the shaft. It was not like that when we put the boat in the water last fall. The props did not look that bad and really only one blade looked tweaked a bit. I sent both props off to get scanned and straightened. I took the prop shafts to a local machine shop and cleaned all the junk off them in a lathe with emery cloth and then set them up in precision v blocks and checked the run out with a dial indicator. One shaft was fine and had a runout of about 1-2 thousandths. The other propshaft had a runout of .040" in the last 18" of the propshaft on the prop end. This was the propshaft that had the anode jammed into the strut. So something hit that shaft hard. I tried to have the machine shop straighten the shaft and the best they could do was about .007" which was not good enough since the spec is less than .002" I called around and eventually lucked into a company that had made the exact shaft I needed before for Sea Ray and they actually had the drawings for the shaft. So, I contracted them to build a new shaft, which they did in a couple of days. I also sent them my coupling so that they could verify the fit on the taper and check that the coupling face was perpendicular to the shaft and take a light cut on the face to make it so if it wasn't.

The props came back along with a scan report which showed that one blade on each prop was way out of pitch compared to the others, and so they must have hit something. I noted that one shaft had a sure seal and the other had the original strong seal, which was worn. I bought a new sure seal for the new shaft and a new lip seal for the other shaft. While I was waiting for the parts to arrive I was thinking about how I could check the alignment of the engines to the shaft log and strut. Frank sent me some ideas and a link to a shaft installation that Masterfab had done which gave me an idea. I had a tapered cone made that was 6 inches long that had a hole in the center the exact size of the propshaft. The taper on the cone was 3.25" on one end and 2.5" on the other, the ID of the shaft log was 3".

image.jpg

I installed the shaft without the sureseal and in its place I put the tapered cone. I then could slide the cone down the shaft and into the shaft log which perfectly centered the shaft in the log.

image.jpg

Now that the shaft was supported at the prop end by the cutless bearing and at the shaft log by the cone, I could install the coupling onto the shaft and align the engines. The starboard engine was very close, but the port engine needed to be moved sideways about 3/16th of an inch!

image.jpg

So with the shaft held centered I aligned both engines left and right and up and down to withing a couple of thousandths. Then I aligned the gap in the coupling halves to one thousandth.

The next day I installed the sureseals, the shafts and props and got it all buttoned up. I also took the time to add cross over cooling between the sureseals so that if I had to ever run on one engine I wouldn't have to worry about tying the prop in place to keep the seal from overheating.

The following day we splashed the boat and I moved it back to my marina. The boat was very smooth with no signs of vibration. After a week I checked the alignment and the starboard coupling was within one thousandth and the port coupling was within two thousandth. I mucked around with the port side and could only get it within .0015", but that is well withing the .004" spec. I took the boat for a spin and was very surpirsed at how smooth the boat was and the noticable lack of vibration at all speeds. I was also surprised that the boat picked up a whole knot of speed. Previously at 2400 rpm it would run 23 kts and at 2800 rpm it would run 28 kts. Now it runs 24 kts at 2400 and 29+ kts at 2800.

All in all it was a pretty easy and straight forward job and the results were excellent. Now I just have to get over the paranoia of hitting something else in the water.

Pete
 
Nice work, Pete. Now that the shafts are precisely centered in the shaft logs, you'll get the longest possible life out of the Sureseals. I'm happy my blog was helpful - that's why it's there.

Dale
 
Pete - what is the reason for Zinc's on the shafts? Sea Ray says no to these as the boat will be over-zinc'd. My boat is out of the water for bottom and running gear and if there is a good reason, I'll add the zincs.
 
When I bought the boat it had zinc on the shafts, trim tabs and a diver plate on the back. I bought the boat in fresh water, but it still had zincs which in my opinion were useless. I asked the dealer (MM) to replace all the zincs with Magnesium Anodes. They supposedly did this, I have a bill to prove it, but recently figured out that they put on Zincs instead of Magnesium, even though they billed me for the magnesium. They are going to get a nasty letter about that soon. Anyway, I was talking with Frank and he said that Sea Ray stopped putting anodes on the shaft a few years after my boat was built and said it was unnecessary. I had also read that it disturbs the flow of water to the prop. So, I decided to leave them off this time. I did check the resistance between the shaft and diver plate and it was a couple of ohms, so it is well bonded.

Pete
 
I do not have brushes on the shaft. Apparently the shaft is grounded through the transmission and engine.

I am by no means an expert on Zincs or their application. In fresh water I don't see a need for them as corrosion issues are much less.

Maybe Frank will chime in with some more precise advice. I decided I would leave mine off and see what happens. I need to pull the boat and paint the bottom next year anyway.

Pete
 
One can argue bonding thru the transmission to the engine ground, I suppose, but Sea Ray changed their recommendation some years ago to eliminate the shaft zincs. I am in a marina with roughly 100 Sea Ray inboards stored in the water and in 25 years, I have never seen or heard of a single case where galvanic erosion was found on running gear. I found that shaft zincs were more trouble than they are worth.....slinging them off (50/50 chance they hit the hull and give you a divot to repair), they like to slide down the shaft, etc. I haven't used them since 2000.

However, this is a marina with very well maintained boats and dockside electrical service. Your results might be different if you are in a marina with some stray current in the water from boats or a poorly maintained electrical distribution system.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,193
Messages
1,428,281
Members
61,104
Latest member
Three Amigos
Back
Top