have to read it to believe it , a Democratic proposal

The only thing missing is that she is not suggesting waivers for party affiliation.....yet.
 
Fine, but she has to be first in line for a hysterectomy. A lip width reduction wouldn’t hurt either.
 
I would guess that this is a tongue in cheek slap back at the republican party for wanted to control women's rights to abortion.

Sort of like the republican legislator in WA who put in a bill that would require a significant lock (Ballard Locks) in Seattle and several other locks on rivers in the west side of the state be removed. All in the name of salmon recovery efforts. He did it because the libs on the west side of the state want to tear down the dams on the Snake river.
 
<Thoughtful Rant>
This is the first election since I was old enough to even care who was running or why, that the choice is as clear as it can be. Forget the candidates, and look at the mantra. You can't accidentally vote for the wrong path. Which ever way you vote, it will be about that party's intentions. Either choice will have substantial impact on today's normal. Staying home will do no good. Pick your poison. Figure out which poison will be better for us(you).
</Thoughtful Rant>
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,202
Messages
1,428,428
Members
61,107
Latest member
Hoffa509
Back
Top