Brunswick Adjusting to Smaller Boat Industry

Dave S

Well-Known Member
TECHNICAL Contributor
Oct 3, 2006
6,014
Upstate South Carolina
Boat Info
Boatless
Engines
Boatless
Sourced from http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090713-713297.html

CHICAGO (Dow Jones)--After once trying to emulate auto giants Toyota Motors (TM) and General Motors Corp., recreational boat builder Brunswick Corp. (BC) is now shrinking itself to fit a boating industry facing a permanently smaller horizon.
Boats are typically among the first luxury items to get tossed overboard when consumers pull back on discretionary purchases in a bad economy. But the severity of the sales pullback has touched off a wave of employee layoffs, bankruptcies and structural changes in the way boats are built and sold that parallel many of the remedies deployed in the ailing automotive sector.
Brunswick Chairman and Chief Executive Dustan McCoy has concluded that boat sales won't rebound to their pre-recession levels when the U.S. economy improves. McCoy sees the loss of extra income from the collapse of the residential housing bubble weighing down boaters' buying power for years and making lenders cautious about providing cheap credit for boat purchases.
"Credit will have a significant impact on the industry's growth," said McCoy, 60, who's headed the Lake Forest, Ill., company since December 2005. "There are naturally going to be fewer dealers and fewer boat brands. We've got to get our costs positioned to be profitable at a lower sales volume."
Brunswick, whose 19 brands include Bayliner, Sea Ray, Hatteras and Trophy, recently began guaranteeing loan payments for boat buyers who lose their jobs, an idea borrowed from the auto industry. But McCoy is counting on Brunswick's ability to come up with user-friendly, value-added features to expand the customer base for motor boats and increase profit margins from a smaller sales volume.
He's especially optimistic about joystick steering technology, which allows boaters to easily adjust the direction of the propulsion from inboard engines, making it easy to turn large boats in crowded marinas and maneuver yachts into tight slips.
"It takes the inhibition out of getting on a boat," said McCoy, who joined Brunswick in 1999. "This is the next big thing in boating."
Others are more skeptical, noting that Volvo (VOLVY) already offers some of the same capabilities on its marine engines. Moreover, stubbornly high inventories are keeping dealers from restocking new boats with joystick steering.
"In the short term, it's not going to drive sales by itself," said Philip Gorham, an analyst for Morningstar Inc.
Industrywide sales of power boats fell 24% last year from 2007 to 203,000. Brunswick expects industry sales this year to slip to about 150,000 boats, roughly half the sales volume for 2005.
Brunswick's 2008 revenue fell 17% to $4.70 billion, 77% of which came from marine sales. Pool tables, bowling equipment and exercise machines made up the remaining 23%. Forty-four percent of its sales came from outside the U.S., mostly from Europe.
Brunswick lost $788.1 million, or $8.93 a share, last year. The red ink spilled into 2009 as the company reported a first-quarter net loss of $184.2 million, or $2.08 a share. Overall sales plunged 45% to 734.7 million, led by a 64% reduction in boating group sales.
Brunswick's stock price has plunged about 76% from its 52-week high last September. It closed Monday up 23 cents, or 6.18%, at $3.95 a share.
To stem its losses, Brunswick has closed 14 plants and reduced its marine and administrative work force by 46% since the end of 2007. It's also killed or sold five boat brands, some of which were acquired during a buying spree earlier in the decade that elevated it to the world's largest recreational boat manufacturer.
Inspired by the strategy once used by General Motors to conquer the auto industry, former CEO George Buckley, who now heads 3M Co. (MMM), envisioned the acquisitions giving Brunswick an extensive lineup of boat types at every price range. By increasing the production volume of boats and engines, Buckley reasoned that Brunswick could drive down its costs and impose a Toyota-type consistency for quality and reliability to keep boaters with Brunswick brands as they purchased other boats.
"If the economy had kept going like it was, it would have been a wonderful strategy," said Phil Keeter, president of the Marine Retailers Association of America.
Even when the economy and the boat market recover, however, observers predict dealers' reduced access to credit will likely keep them from accumulating the large inventories needed to sustain production at many boat factories year-round.
-By Bob Tita, Dow Jones Newswires; 312-750-4129; robert.tita@dowjones.com
 
Their previous strategy was stupid. Boats aren't like cars. Boats are hand-made. Each model is unique. It's not like Toyoda that can engineer a couple of platforms where each platform's engineering hosts several different models of vehicle. There's not much in common between a bayliner, sea ray, and a hatteras. Actually, there's not much in common between a 43DA and a 44DB. How was stupid going to keep, "increasing the production volume of boats and engines, [so] that Brunswick could drive down its costs and impose a Toyota-type consistency for quality and reliability" when the various brands and models had little commonality? It was a strategy doomed to failure from the start.

But wall street loved it. It rang all the right bells with all the right buzz words. That the street fundamentally does not understand the business had no bearing on the matter.
 
Last edited:
Survival of Boat Dealers is going to be a much bigger issue. Most dealers have reduced their overhead as much as possible already and if they are waiting for a recovery that just won't happen, how long can some of them last?
 

Well written article. What I take from these observations is that without a decent credit market, many sectors of the economy will continue to recede. Most consumers are not in a position to layout several hundred thousand dollars or even tens of thousands "off the hip" for anything...especially a recreational toy..

The banks have been chosen by those empowered ones in our Federal G to receive assistance. The hope was that these bailout dollars would quickly find their way into the hands of the consumers to create a real economic flow of goods and services. It was stupid to supply these funds without directives as to how they would be disbursed to consumers.

In my view, all that's been accomplished is that we have provided the banks with capitalization to fund their various short term needs and to pay those that are at the helm with nice fat compensation packages. All of these funds have done nothing to cure the basic credit problem.
These financial wizards have done nothing more than engage in an elaborate "mental masturbation" to show each other how good they are at moving a pile of money from one stack to another.

Our nation is poised to do something great. We have the spirit and the knowledge to accomplish great things. The fuel for this is capitalization. The capital must be directed properly. The Fed in this last exercise had the "car at the pump" but ran all of the fuel out on the ground instead of in the tank.:thumbsup:
 
Our nation is poised to do something great. We have the spirit and the knowledge to accomplish great things. :thumbsup:

I agree with you however it will never happen with the clowns that are currently in charge. In fact they will do everything in their power to beat down the public and stop any meaningful progress. We have to hope the American people wake up and smell the truck loads of B.S. coming out of Washington.
 
Their previous strategy was stupid. Boats aren't like cars. Boats are hand-made. Each model is unique. It's not like Toyoda that can engineer a couple of platforms where each platform's engineering hosts several different models of vehicle. There's not much in common between a bayliner, sea ray, and a hatteras. Actually, there's not much in common between a 43DA and a 44DB. How was stupid going to keep, "increasing the production volume of boats and engines, [so] that Brunswick could drive down its costs and impose a Toyota-type consistency for quality and reliability" when the various brands and models had little commonality? It was a strategy doomed to failure from the start.

But wall street loved it. It rang all the right bells with all the right buzz words. That the street fundamentally does not understand the business had no bearing on the matter.

No actually this was a pretty good idea and like the President of the retail association said..if the economy hadnt of fallen apart this would've been great. Please dont dont get offended but you are way off on this. There could be ALOT in common between bayliner, sea ray and hatteras. Just because they are at different price points doesnt mean that they couldnt benefit from the purchasing power generated by using the same engines across the board or the same guage manufacuturer or whatever. If you look at honda and toyota, one thing no one can argue is how they have gotten the perception of quality across the board. You get this by building a good vehicle and to do that you have to eliminate areas where you can lose quality....like using three different companies to source your exhaust bellows or stupid stuff like that. By using many of the same components you will bring the quality of the lowest product up and make the possibility of owning the higher level more attainable. i.e....kid buys civic as first car...graduates college gets first real job, buys a basic accord, does well, gets married, buys a loaded accord, has kids, gets a management position...feels comfortable in the accord but wifey says its not nice enough....gets Acura TL......Never misses a beat ....never feels like he has to learn much new about his cars...just turns the key and drives
 
There's some synergy in purchasing power. But all the boats don't use the same components. Sea Ray Sport boats and Sport Cruisers use aluminum windshield frames. But Sport Yachts and Yachts use stainless steel. Not a big volume discount if you're buying different stuff.

Still, the rest of the idea is stupid. Using your analogy, Honda stuffs leather seats and sound insulation into an Accord and voila! far more profitable Acura TL. The article used Toyoda, but I don't know their product platforms so well, so I'll use Ford instead. Ford has two major car platforms. One derives from the Mazda 6, the CD3 platform. The other derives from the Volvo S80, the D3 platform. From the former they get the Ford Fusion, Mercury Milan, and Lincoln MKZ. The D3 underpins the Ford Taurus, Mercury Sable, Ford Edge, Lincoln MKX, Lincoln MKX and slightly revised to the D4 platform the D4 which form the Ford Flex and Lincoln MKT

I don't see Brunswick stuffing a nicer interior into a Bayliner hull and selling it as a Sea Ray, or taking a Sea Ray hull, adding some nicer beefier hardware and selling it as a Hatteras. Nor can they leverage the engineering for one class of boat and use it for a whole family of boats. Some builders tried that in the 80 with their new CAD systems. They got boats that either ran like pigs or chine walked.

Reusing expensive engineering is what auto manufacturers do reduce costs and increase profits. And it doesn't work with boats. The Bayliner / Maxum thing didn't really work out too well. Everyone knew Maxum was just an upgraded Bayliner. Brunswick was starting to get some traction with Meridian as more upscale since they "divorced" the line from Bayliner, but again, the Meridian hulls are Meridian hulls. There's no commonality with Bayliners.

Best regards,
Frank C
 
Last edited:
Frank,

FYI...Toyota dresses up the Camry and it becomes a Lexus ES 350...Avalon becomes LS 460,etc.

You make a good argument that there is no cross platform integration between the Brunswick boat makes and models...other than they are all married to MerCruiser.:thumbsup:
 
Last edited:
There could be a lot of synergy gained with the strategy Brunswick had embarked upon prior to the current economy. After all, at the end of the day - is there really that much material difference in the way a Bayliner and a Sea Ray hull are constructed? Or more importantly, would there be if they both rolled down the same assembly lines using common design teams, manufacturing techniques, tooling and labor and inventory for the powerplants an drive gear and then just go their separate pathe on the dress up parts from fabrics and fittings to alumnum versus SS windshield frames, etc? Maybe a challenging strategy, but stupid seems rather harsh for a management team that sold an awful lot of boats during the time folks had or could get the funds needed to buy or finance their boat purchase.
 
"There could be a lot of synergy gained with the strategy Brunswick had embarked upon prior to the current economy. After all, at the end of the day - is there really that much material difference in the way a Bayliner and a Sea Ray hull are constructed?"

If and when the credit markets free up, that cross platform idea might be what brings the popular price boat market back. There is no question that it could be done.

What I look for is for the Chinese to get into it. They are masters of replication.

You could buy your base model Bray Riner or upgrade to the more sophisticated Srea Wray:thumbsup: You know the Chinese, they own over half of our debt anyway...they very well may come out on top in this deal and buy Sea Ray from Brunswick to get a strong foot hold in the market.

Can you imagine the David Pacoe reviews.....:wow:
 
Face it, boats are "luxury" items. They are the first to suffer from folks who can no longer afford them or have switched priorities because of the economy. I am surprised that.....shhhhhh :smt015

the administration has not brought back taxing us boat owners as a "luxury item"!!!!

One thing I don't face that you all do is personal property tax. I pay $21 a year to register my boat and that's it.

Just to throw this out there: Is not Meridian now part of Brunswick/Sea Ray?:huh:
 
Actually, there is a great deal of difference how Bayliner and Sea Ray build boats. There was an article about bow Bayliner was building their new line of big boats. It was very different and a huge labor savings. But no one else is using that method, even within Brunswick. That division was split off Bayliner and is now Meridian. I don't have the magazine reference for that new manufacturing technique. You'll just have to look it up on your own.

Meridian is still part of the US Marine group that runs Bayliner and Maxim. Sea Ray is in it's own group that also has Boston Whaler and formerly also Baja, which was split off and forced onto Fountain.

It costs a lot of money to build a Viking or Hatteras style hull. It take big horsepower to make them go fast though the water. Using the same hull in a Bayliner, Sea Ray and Hatteras will either raise the bayliner's price to the point that it can't be sold or drop the Hatteras to the point where it falls apart off shore.


Best regards,
Frank
 
Last edited:
Actually, there is a great deal of difference how Bayliner and Sea Ray build boats. There was an article about bow Bayliner was building their new line of big boats. It was very different and a huge labor savings. But no one else is using that method, even within Brunswick. That division was split off Bayliner and is now Meridian. I don't have the magazine reference for that new manufacturing technique. You'll just have to look it up on your own.

Meridian is still part of the US Marine group that runs Bayliner and Maxim. Sea Ray is in it's own group that also has Boston Whaler and formerly also Baja, which was split off and forced onto Fountain.

It costs a lot of money to build a Viking or Hatteras style hull. It take big horsepower to make them go fast though the water. Using the same hull in a Bayliner, Sea Ray and Hatteras will either raise the bayliner's price to the point that it can't be sold or drop the Hatteras to the point where it falls apart off shore.


Best regards,
Frank

Huh, I thought I read somewhere here where SR took over Merdian......maybe it was they were moving into the Merritt Island facility.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,278
Messages
1,429,928
Members
61,149
Latest member
Mark Knight
Back
Top