Having trouble understanding current events

The judge did not side with Trump that they are his documents. The judge ruled a special masters can view the documents and separate any documents that are Trumps and what belongs to the people. The President also can't change an agency created document that is classified, the law is very clear on that.
WHO’s law? That is not what judge Bergman ruled, but we all know the the courts are politicized…
 
@Iprof

upload_2022-9-16_15-45-37.png


upload_2022-9-16_15-45-47.png
 
The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals wrote in a 2020 decision about whether statements made by then-President Trump declassified the existence of a CIA program that “declassification, even by the president, must follow established procedures.”

If a document is declassified, that doesn’t automatically mean it can be shared widely, either. For example, nuclear information – which is generally classified – is also protected by the federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954
This is unconstitutional, and if a dem President were involved the decision would be different. Trump truly is the only hope we have to save the constitutional republic from the left…
 
The U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals wrote in a 2020 decision about whether statements made by then-President Trump declassified the existence of a CIA program that “declassification, even by the president, must follow established procedures.”

If a document is declassified, that doesn’t automatically mean it can be shared widely, either. For example, nuclear information – which is generally classified – is also protected by the federal Atomic Energy Act of 1954
Think you and CNN misread that case.
 
This is unconstitutional, and if a dem President were involved the decision would be different. Trump truly is the only hope we have to save the constitutional republic from the left…
LMFAO
 
Think you and CNN misread that case.
You obviously didn't read the attached court decision.
Why do you watch CNN, that could be your problem right there.
 
I did, did you? They didn't hold what you really think they did. But go ahead, run with it.
So a court decision that was not over turned you disagree with. I'll go with the court decision on that one.
 
I'm the President of my company -- do I have to follow our procedures (most of which I wrote)?
I'm sure you do, otherwise you would be a piss-poor leader. As CEO of mine, I know I do, especially those procedures regarding classified information (and I wrote those rules myself). Otherwise I might risk disbarment from contracts or losing our facility clearance, either of which would be disastrous for the company as well as the employees. Same story while in command in the military, where failure to follow procedures could get people killed or result in failure to complete the mission.
 
So a court decision that was not over turned you disagree with. I'll go with the court decision on that one.
It’s not what they held. And only applicable to the second circuit. So yeah, it really doesn’t mean that much. Wish they would go back to teaching civics and the legal system.
 
I'm sure you do, otherwise you would be a piss-poor leader. As CEO of mine, I know I do, especially those procedures regarding classified information (and I wrote those rules myself). Otherwise I might risk disbarment from contracts or losing our facility clearance, either of which would be disastrous for the company as well as the employees. Same story while in command in the military, where failure to follow procedures could get people killed or result in failure to complete the mission.
Yeah, no.
 
Jill Biden thinks illegal immigrants are like breakfast tacos, and according to NBC, where the liberally ill get their news, illegal immigrants are just trash. Can NBC be outraged at itself?
 
Jill Biden thinks illegal immigrants are like breakfast tacos, and according to NBC, where the liberally ill get their news, illegal immigrants are just trash. Can NBC be outraged at itself?
The illegals that have been delivered to the sanctuary cities/states are being referred to as 'victims' by the media. Some woke dumb fucks are saying governors that shipped out illegals to sanctuary places should be charged with kidnappingo_O
 
The illegals that have been delivered to the sanctuary cities/states are being referred to as 'victims' by the media. Some woke dumb fucks are saying governors that shipped out illegals to sanctuary places should be charged with kidnappingo_O
To the liberally ill, the new thing is “ Muh - It’s human trafficking !!” Right on queue, parroting the MSM. As if they gave a shit. LOL! It wasn’t trafficking when Joe Biden was loading jets in the middle of the night, nor is it with our porous border, only when a ‘rethuglican’ tries to clean up his state because the feds won’t do their job - and sending them to a rich, mostly white, elitist island.

These illegals are looking for sanctuary and skipping the process to become citizenry. Democrats applaud and encourage this which includes creating sanctuary cities. All these southern governors are doing is helping these illegals seek sanctuary. Isn’t that what they wanted?

Woody - you should drive along Shepard road along the river in St Paul. There’s some really nice tent cities that are loaded with fentanyl. They could house 50 illegals there. There’s already a bunch here, but they need more. It’s what the cities want. Just asked the angel mom who’s kid was killed by an illegal plowing her minivan into a school bus. She (the illegal)had been cited before, they knew she was illegal, but did nothing.

I'm curious as to how much low income housing is on Martha’s Vineyard? After all, didn’t Obama say something about how it shouldn’t matter what zip code you’re from? I guess Democrats hate brown people. Am I doing it right?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
113,178
Messages
1,428,024
Members
61,088
Latest member
SGT LAT
Back
Top