Trump wants to strike iran ?

[Iprof]

I suppose ‘Big balls’ is giving Iran $150billion, in cash, at night, in an unmarked plane.

..and yet, our current sanctions has them starving.

Tell Merkel to pay her NATO bills.

Are you proud of the fact people in Iran are starving?

The US never gave Iran 150 billion. The US let Iran take their money out of the US.

Trump is no better than drawing a line in the sand.

 

[OllieC]

The US never gave Iran 150 billion. The US let Iran take their money out of the US.

.

Leftist logic justifying Obama allowing funds to go to the middle East’s largest state sponsor of terrorism.....

 

[Iprof]

Leftist logic justifying Obama allowing funds to go to the middle East’s largest state sponsor of terrorism.....

It wasn't the US money it was Iran's money whether you and I like it or not it was not our money.

 

[Golfman25]

It wasn't the US money it was Iran's money whether you and I like it or not it was not our money.

Regardless, it was complete stupidity to give it back to them under their current regime. Say want you want about BO, but Iran was not one of his success stories.

 

[Woody]

Are you proud of the fact people in Iran are starving?

The US never gave Iran 150 billion. The US let Iran take their money out of the US.

Trump is no better than drawing a line in the sand.

I much prefer that than what our German friend Aerobat promotes....the world got a problem somewhere, the USA should drop bombs on it, blow shit up/kill...it's the USA's responsibility he says. Maybe we should poll the Iranian people, would they rather skip some meals or get the Qasem Soleimani treatment.

 

[OllieC]

I much prefer that than what our German friend Aerobat promotes....the world got a problem somewhere, the USA should drop bombs on it, blow shit up/kill...it's the USA's responsibility he says. Maybe we should poll the Iranian people, would they rather skip some meals or get the Qasem Soleimani treatment.

Iran can always feed its people as opposed to seeking nuclear aspirations, cuzz building reactors ain’t cheap....but I guess it’s Trumps fault that we won’t fund a country that promotes terrorism around the world.

 

[aerobat]

Maybe we should poll the Iranian people, would they rather skip some meals or get the Qasem Soleimani treatment.

i give you a point here

seriously : i do not promote a soleimani treatment for iranian people , but then i ask for what the nuclear deal was touched at all ??

they have now 12 times the amount of enriched uranium and its out of control.
under obama , international observers were allowed to control their nuclear program and it was kept far below a weapons grade enrichment . not perfect but far better than now because now the people there are starving AND the mullahs are many steps ahead to a nuclear weapon .

i think we agree its a bad idea to let iran posess nukes.

 

[Golfman25]

i give you a point here

seriously : i do not promote a soleimani treatment for iranian people , but then i ask for what the nuclear deal was touched at all ??

they have now 12 times the amount of enriched uranium and its out of control.
under obama , international observers were allowed to control their nuclear program and it was kept far below a weapons grade enrichment . not perfect but far better than now because now the people there are starving AND the mullahs are many steps ahead to a nuclear weapon .

i think we agree its a bad idea to let iran posess nukes.

They where going to have that anyway. If you think "international observers" where going to do anything, I have a bridge to sell you.

 

[aerobat]

They where going to have that anyway.

that way of thinking is a weak surrender to anything bad happening in life ...

 

[Golfman25]

that way of thinking is a weak surrender to anything bad happening in life ...

No it isn't. Outlaw regimes aren't going to pay any attention to an "Agreement." They are going to lie, cheat and steal. That is their nature. That is why you need to crush them like the bug that they are.

 

[aerobat]

No it isn't. Outlaw regimes aren't going to pay any attention to an "Agreement." They are going to lie, cheat and steal. That is their nature. That is why you need to crush them like the bug that they are.

crushing them by pure bluffing did not work . - trump tried. so so what ? a military strike ?

a co existence and talks ?

 

[OllieC]

No it isn't. Outlaw regimes aren't going to pay any attention to an "Agreement." They are going to lie, cheat and steal. That is their nature. That is why you need to crush them like the bug that they are.

Remember Hans Brix? Team America "If you don't allow inspections ...........

 

[Golfman25]

crushing them by pure bluffing did not work . - trump tried. so so what ? a military strike ?

a co existence and talks ?

As I have previously said, they should have been taken out in 1979. Today, I would take out their nuke sites and military sites. Tomahawks go stale after awhile.

 

[alnav]

As I have previously said, they should have been taken out in 1979. Today, I would take out their nuke sites and military sites. Tomahawks go stale after awhile.

Easy to say but difficult to do.

 

[Iprof]

They where going to have that anyway. If you think "international observers" where going to do anything, I have a bridge to sell you.

I'm not surprised someone sold you a bridge you need to sell.

 

[Woody]

i give you a point here

seriously : i do not promote a soleimani treatment for iranian people , but then i ask for what the nuclear deal was touched at all ??

they have now 12 times the amount of enriched uranium and its out of control.
under obama , international observers were allowed to control their nuclear program and it was kept far below a weapons grade enrichment . not perfect but far better than now because now the people there are starving AND the mullahs are many steps ahead to a nuclear weapon .

i think we agree its a bad idea to let iran posess nukes.

i think we agree its a bad idea to let iran posess nukes.

Seriously, why do you think it's a bad idea? What will they do with them?