New prop design.....interesting.

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Quint4, Oct 14, 2019.

  1. Fly'n Family

    Fly'n Family Active Member

    755
    Sep 19, 2013
    TX / CO
    2008 Meridian 341
    2004 Boston Whaler Sport 130 w/40 hp Merc
    6.2's
    Very impressive.....hopefully someone gets a cost answer. Pretty easy to extrapolate the value from there.
     
  2. spikedaddy99

    spikedaddy99 Well-Known Member GOLD Sponsor

    Jun 11, 2008
    Prentice, Wi
    2005 500 DB
    QSM-11
    No answer 24ish hours later. M
     
  3. Lazy Daze

    Lazy Daze Well-Known Member TECHNICAL Contributor GOLD Sponsor

    Apr 21, 2009
    PA
    Various
    Various
    Very interesting. Whether this plays out for the recreational market or not, who knows. But at the very least, it's nice to see some thought going into a different way of doing things. I remember, quite a while ago, there was some kind of prop where the blades changed their angle as the RPM's changed? Sort of like shifting gears in a car. But there were issues with it. I don't recall much else, though.

    Another thought... and this is not to take away from the product, just wondering outloud... right now, there is a very well established network of prop shops that can fix damaged props. What would happen in this case? Sent back to manufacturer? Just have to buy a new one? These would obviously be more difficult to repair and would require a prop shop to make a sizable investment into the tooling (if even possible).
     
    JVM225 likes this.
  4. techmitch

    techmitch Well-Known Member GOLD Sponsor

    May 1, 2008
    Chesapeake Bay, Middle River/Frog Mortar Creek MD.
    1999 270 DA
    Twin 4.3s W/Alpa I Gen II's
    Bad connection today and video keeps breaking up. Does it say anything about performance in reverse?
     
  5. Air O'Nautical

    Air O'Nautical Active Member

    Feb 5, 2008
    Stamford CT "Ponus Yacht Club"
    1995 400EC. Raymarine E80,4kw dome, Garmin 235 gps,
    2013 7.4L Mercruiser Blue water.
    Hurth straight shaft 630's,
    Westerbeke 7.0 BCG
    Boattest.com claimed it was far superior both forward and reverse.
    Pretty exciting advancements to the old screw.
     
  6. JVM225

    JVM225 Well-Known Member GOLD Sponsor

    Apr 8, 2008
    Farmingdale, NY
    2002 410 Sundancer, Monaco Edition.
    3126 Cats.
    They would have to be really competitively priced in order to get a foothold in the recreational market.
    They’d also probably have to develop a wide network of dealers with good stock available to replace damaged props on recreational boats.
     
  7. Gofirstclass

    Gofirstclass Well-Known Member

    Apr 20, 2010
    Tri Cities, WA
    1995 550 Sedan Bridge,
    2010 Boston Whaler 130 Super Sport,
    1981 Boston Whaler 130 Sport,
    CAT 3406C's, 580hp.
    I agree with JVM, and all of those things he mentioned take time to get set up. He'd also have to create a large manufacturing facility just to get some props out there for boaters to buy.
     
  8. douglee25

    douglee25 Well-Known Member

    Jan 13, 2008
    Dallas, TX
    Cruisers 3575
    Twin 7.4l
    Interested!
     
  9. Gofirstclass

    Gofirstclass Well-Known Member

    Apr 20, 2010
    Tri Cities, WA
    1995 550 Sedan Bridge,
    2010 Boston Whaler 130 Super Sport,
    1981 Boston Whaler 130 Sport,
    CAT 3406C's, 580hp.
    Just to clarify, I have no interest in buying a new set of props. After our summer long trip to Canada we'll be selling Beachcomber and buying a motor home of some sort.

    Makes no sense at this point to drop ~10 boat bucks on props I'd probably never use.
     
  10. Motoguy2158

    Motoguy2158 Member

    46
    Oct 13, 2018
    Marysville, Mi
    340 Sundancer 2002
    6.2 Mercruiser with ZF V Drives, Garmin Nav, Radar and Autopilot
    Very interesting to see what it would do on my 340 with v drives. The only test they have advertised was on a small outboard boat... They talk about freighters and large ocean type boats. Just wondering if small and light boats or slow and heavy might be a sweet spot for them. I sent in an inquiry regarding my boat. Will be interesting to see.
     
  11. radscoot

    radscoot Member

    42
    Nov 8, 2016
    Georgian Bay, Canada
    260 Sundancer, 2006,
    5.7 Merc/Bravo 111
  12. PMC

    PMC Well-Known Member

    Apr 10, 2009
    Long Island, NY
    2001 40 Sedan Bridge
    Cummins 6CTA
    It is a very interesting design. It reads like an aluminium 3D Lazer printed, which I suspect is disposable after a strike......but if the numbers are right, you keep a spares and buy new.......
     
  13. mwph

    mwph Active Member

    Jul 8, 2008
    Lake Guntersville, Tennessee River, Alabama
    1998 250 DA
    7.4L, B3
    Interesting data to say the least.
    As mentioned in earlier posts, I too think that the price point may be prohibitive to the large majority of recreational boaters. I for one am not overly concerned with fuel burn & top speed. I would like a slower plane speed, but am not willing to spend a fortune to get it. I suspect that that is representitive of a lot of "recreational boaters".
     
    Darrenfon likes this.
  14. Boat Guy

    Boat Guy Well-Known Member

    Any pricing yet?
     
  15. DWABoat

    DWABoat Member

    49
    Aug 13, 2019
    S Louisiana
    2001 280 Sundancer
    1989 220CC Cuddy Cabin
    Twin 4.3 w/Alpha Ones
    5.7 Mercruiser Alpha One
    Some real good points above on choice in the recreational industry.
    If the prop does give better performance but costs a lot more, it would probably only affect new boat sales due to cost-benefit for existing boats.
    Then, the prop selection would be similar to buying a new Chevy truck today: the 5.3L or the 6.2L? Certainly the 6.2 is a beast in performance, but initial cost and long term economy keep many of us rooted.
    I can see where offshore fisherman needing speed and unlikely to hit a log may choose a prop like that, even if it costs a thousand more.
    I run rescue boats in the MS River. While I need speed, I need a prop that can hit logs and other debris and still make it to my destination. Saving a little fuel or planing a few seconds quicker are not my primary concern. Unless these props are stronger than a 4-blade SS, we will not be changing to these new props with my organization.
     

Share This Page

Show Sidebar