zippinbye
New Member
- Apr 10, 2010
- 12
- Boat Info
- 1986 Sundancer 268
- Engines
- 4.3L/205 h.p. x 2 w/ Alpha drives
I know there's a model-specific thread for the mid-90's Sundancer 270s, but I did not see these two questions answered there. 15 years ago I was looking for a 1994-ish 270, but I ended up buying a pristine 1986 model 268 instead. It's been a fine boat, but the cockpit layout sucks for cruising comfort and socializing if you're more than a couple. Now I'm back to seeking a 1994 and up Sundancer (anything pre-280, but 280's are not necessarily excluded either) for a number of reasons. While I like the twin 4.3 drivability, performance and economy based on how my 268 runs, I'm leaning toward the simplicity of a single, and having a few square inches to work with in the bilge. I like the benefits of a Bravo 3 as well. Can anybody give me some fuel consumption and speed specs on a 270 with 7.4L and Bravo 3 power?
Also, how about trailering - does anybody fess up to the 9'2" beam and comply with all the wide load permitting requirements? I'm thinking the Slick Wille rule could apply; don't ask, don't tell. It would take a pretty astute county mountie to ID a 270 as wide load material at a glance; it's just 8 inches out of legal. I'm hyper cognizant of load limits when it comes to weight. I demand plenty of excess tire and axle weight bearing capacity on trailers and tow vehicles, as well as compliance with overall and combined gross weight limitations. But I don't see any glaring safety implications from a measly 8 inches, which is only 4 inches in each direction At least, that's my first thought as I consider the hassles and inconveniences of wide load operations through multiple states . Daylight operation requirements and city bypasses could put a real damper on getaway plans. Please fill me in on the realities of towing one of this "barely-illegal" loads. Thanks!
Also, how about trailering - does anybody fess up to the 9'2" beam and comply with all the wide load permitting requirements? I'm thinking the Slick Wille rule could apply; don't ask, don't tell. It would take a pretty astute county mountie to ID a 270 as wide load material at a glance; it's just 8 inches out of legal. I'm hyper cognizant of load limits when it comes to weight. I demand plenty of excess tire and axle weight bearing capacity on trailers and tow vehicles, as well as compliance with overall and combined gross weight limitations. But I don't see any glaring safety implications from a measly 8 inches, which is only 4 inches in each direction At least, that's my first thought as I consider the hassles and inconveniences of wide load operations through multiple states . Daylight operation requirements and city bypasses could put a real damper on getaway plans. Please fill me in on the realities of towing one of this "barely-illegal" loads. Thanks!