Yikes…. I can’t read all that…. Is there Cole’s notes versionThat's the interesting part. In MI you can gift a gun to your minor kid. In MI the minor kid can possess the gun in some circumstances although the parents are the true possessors overall of the kids gun. In MI a person can own and possess some firearms before they are legally able to buy them from a licensed dealer. In MI there is no requirement for guns to be kept under lock and key.
The parents said the gun was in their room, their lawyer said the gun was locked up. Importantly it wasn't in the kids room, the parents had possession. The Prosecutor said that makes no difference, the kid had access. Think about what that means for anyone who has their guns secured but the kid figures out how to defeat those measures.
The media likes to tell that the kid was with the parent when the gun was purchased, that's not illegal. The Prosecutor cites some emails and social media post as evidence, none of the contents are illegal. The kid and mother talked about the Xmas present and the first time going together to try it out.
The Prosecutor said the parents should have known. At this point nothing has come out that the kid has a history of mental problems and the kid had a clean record at school...so should have known what?
We've got to remember this unfolded in two days. A point was made that he was searching for ammo on his phone while in school. Maybe his parents told him they wouldn't be going to the range every weekend because ammo was expensive and he was trying to find the cheapest. He shouldn't have been playing with his phone during school time, looking for ammo, or looking at the picture a girl friend just sexted of her titties either.
The parents, student, and school counselor met the next day because the kid drew 'disturbing' stuff. They say the kid conducted himself well, explained the pictures were of an idea he had for a video game. The media says the parents were resistant to taking the kid home that day. After meeting with the school counselors that felt no 'discipline was warranted' and he could go back to class what would be the point. If the counselors felt there was a threat they wouldn't have allowed him in the school, they'd of had the police there, the kid would have been searched, probably the whole school would have been searched. In fact the counselors opinions might even have been comforting to the parents...because they didn't think the situation warranted any of those things.
Something was wrong with that kid, for how long who knows but he fooled everyone. The kid deserves what he gets IMHO, but what about the parents? Up to 60yrs in prison each for what their son did. Their son was not a 6yo that doesn't understand things, plays with a gun found in a drawer and shoots their little friend. Their son is charged as an adult, at 15yo he did understand things, he was capable of making his own decisions, he was capable of plotting to carry them out, he was fully aware of what the results would be....all this independently. You may tie the 6yo actions to the parents but I think the 15yo is different.
The Prosecutor said one of the reasons she decided to charge the parents was her 'feelings' as a mother, as a community member, as a prosecutor. Think about that.