Rittenhouse case

bc71281fbdf53f51.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: RBB
It's almost as if Kyle Rittenhouse trained for this moment his whole life?

He went there under many pretenses but it's pretty easy to surmise he also went there with a very good possibility he was gonna get to "blow away some commies that are destroying America."

FYI, he didn't administer any first aid to anyone on that night but did lie and claim to be an EMT at some point so the "I'm there to give first aid" deal was cute but just another divert to the main reason he was there and that was the opportunity to shoot folks he considered the opposition. It is what it is and his mission was accomplished.

I have no idea how this will play out but it's been very interesting to watch. It will tell us a lot of what our future will hold.

CA98A5EF-6A64-499A-9CA2-FC46C5133441.jpeg
 
Texomakid said:
It's almost as if Kyle Rittenhouse trained for this moment his whole life?

He went there under many pretenses but it's pretty easy to surmise he also went there with a very good possibility he was gonna get to "blow away some commies that are destroying America."

FYI, he didn't administer any first aid to anyone on that night but did lie and claim to be an EMT at some point so the "I'm there to give first aid" deal was cute but just another divert to the main reason he was there and that was the opportunity to shoot folks he considered the opposition. It is what it is and his mission was accomplished.

I have no idea how this will play out but it's been very interesting to watch. It will tell us a lot of what our future will hold.

View attachment 115759
Click to expand...


Kinda funny how so many people get upset when you bring up the past actions of some thug that tried to assault a cop (and actually DOES have a history of violence, unlike Kyle) and got shot, saying anything they did in the past has no bearing on the events of the night in question. But when the tables are turned and a guy legally and rightfully defends his life from those actively trying to harm or kill him, somehow the same rules don't apply. It's almost like that argument only works one way...... like the series of events that let to the riots, um- "protests" of that night in the first place.
 
Last edited:
Texomakid said:
It's almost as if Kyle Rittenhouse trained for this moment his whole life?

He went there under many pretenses but it's pretty easy to surmise he also went there with a very good possibility he was gonna get to "blow away some commies that are destroying America."

FYI, he didn't administer any first aid to anyone on that night but did lie and claim to be an EMT at some point so the "I'm there to give first aid" deal was cute but just another divert to the main reason he was there and that was the opportunity to shoot folks he considered the opposition. It is what it is and his mission was accomplished.

I have no idea how this will play out but it's been very interesting to watch. It will tell us a lot of what our future will hold.

View attachment 115759
Click to expand...
Bull crap. He actaully retreated/ran from each encounter, almost like a coward. It wasn't until he was cornered or on the ground that he shot. If he really wanted to shoot someone, he would have taken up a position and started blasting away. Had the cops been allowed to do their job, none of this would have happened.
 
chase me in that situation and I am armed u r not going to like the outcome. he was retreating gentlemen, they was coming after him. thats what i seen in the video's.
 
Golfman25 said:
Had the cops been allowed to do their job, none of this would have happened.
Click to expand...
Golfman, I beg to differ with your statement/assumption. I truly believe that if the cops had their way they would have had as many LEO's there as possible and would have handled the situation much differently.

It's not the cops who failed during the (pick your city/date) riots, it was the city administration who had the cops stand down. If the cops on the street had the backing of their city "fathers" those riots we had across the country would have lasted about 2 hours. If that was the case and the cops started arresting the rioters I guaranfuckingtee you that the riots would have been over in a hurry.

Ya gotta have enough huevos to allow your cops to do their job and enough huevos to back them when the shit hits the fan.
 
Gofirstclass said:
Golfman, I beg to differ with your statement/assumption. I truly believe that if the cops had their way they would have had as many LEO's there as possible and would have handled the situation much differently.

It's not the cops who failed during the (pick your city/date) riots, it was the city administration who had the cops stand down. If the cops on the street had the backing of their city "fathers" those riots we had across the country would have lasted about 2 hours. If that was the case and the cops started arresting the rioters I guaranfuckingtee you that the riots would have been over in a hurry.

Ya gotta have enough huevos to allow your cops to do their job and enough huevos to back them when the shit hits the fan.
Click to expand...

X 10... Well said Sir.
 
Gofirstclass said:
Golfman, I beg to differ with your statement/assumption. I truly believe that if the cops had their way they would have had as many LEO's there as possible and would have handled the situation much differently.

It's not the cops who failed during the (pick your city/date) riots, it was the city administration who had the cops stand down. If the cops on the street had the backing of their city "fathers" those riots we had across the country would have lasted about 2 hours. If that was the case and the cops started arresting the rioters I guaranfuckingtee you that the riots would have been over in a hurry.

Ya gotta have enough huevos to allow your cops to do their job and enough huevos to back them when the shit hits the fan.
Click to expand...
I think that is what he was saying, the cops werent allowed to do their jobs. Their hands were tied by the powers that be for political reasons.
I heard the state was calling up the national guard for the expected "peaceful protests" that may result from the verdict of this trial, which is funny, if they would have done that during the riots, rittenhouse may not have felt the need to go there in the first place.
 
Gofirstclass said:
Golfman, I beg to differ with your statement/assumption. I truly believe that if the cops had their way they would have had as many LEO's there as possible and would have handled the situation much differently.

It's not the cops who failed during the (pick your city/date) riots, it was the city administration who had the cops stand down. If the cops on the street had the backing of their city "fathers" those riots we had across the country would have lasted about 2 hours. If that was the case and the cops started arresting the rioters I guaranfuckingtee you that the riots would have been over in a hurry.

Ya gotta have enough huevos to allow your cops to do their job and enough huevos to back them when the shit hits the fan.
Click to expand...
That's why I used the pharse "if the cops where allowed."
 
JayhawkCurtis said:
I think that is what he was saying, the cops werent allowed to do their jobs. Their hands were tied by the powers that be for political reasons.
I heard the state was calling up the national guard for the expected "peaceful protests" that may result from the verdict of this trial, which is funny, if they would have done that during the riots, rittenhouse may not have felt the need to go there in the first place.
Click to expand...
Exactly. "Allowed" is the operative term.
 
JayhawkCurtis said:
calling up the national guard for the expected "peaceful protests" that may result from the verdict of this trial
Click to expand...
Unfortunately this is a prime example of how broken our government and justice system truly is. Why would we need to call the National Guard out for a peaceful protest? This country has become so polarized that "we the people" cannot demonstrate, congregate, assemble or protest without it morphing into something (____) lives matter, criminal, violent, or deadly.

There will most assuredly be outrage over the outcome of this trial.
 
MoonRiver said:
Unfortunately this is a prime example of how broken our government and justice system truly is. Why would we need to call the National Guard out for a peaceful protest? This country has become so polarized that "we the people" cannot demonstrate, congregate, assemble or protest without it morphing into something (____) lives matter, criminal, violent, or deadly.

There will most assuredly be outrage over the outcome of this trial.
Click to expand...

There lies the rub, another false narrative was pushed, But now that its apparent the it was a white on white issue, The double down has to happen.

They have to call it racism, because they don't have an anti-second amendment goon squad, because that would be suicide for the volunteers.
 
TheDudeAbides said:
There seem to be a few unanswered questions I have with those that think Kyle should not have had an AR with him:

Did Kyle not have the right to be at that location helping with the injured and assisting the community instead of sitting back and watching innocent people caught in the rioting?

While at the location, given the situation going on around him, did Kyle have the right (and foresight) to possess the means to defend himself should he be threatened?

Regardless of the type of weapon used, did Kyle have the right to use whatever weapon he had to defend his life while being attacked?

Would it have made any difference if he had carried/used a handgun to protect himself instead of the rifle?

Do you think he should have carried a handgun (illegal because he's not 21) instead of the rifle (legal for his age), thereby ACTUALLY breaking the law?
Click to expand...

It seems difficult for some to distinguish between having the right to do something vs making sound decisions.

You are within your rights to drink a fifth of vodka each morning, smoke 12 packs of sigs each afternoon. Just like Kyle was within his rights to carry that AR up to WI. I put both of those two examples into the same bucket of "lets go ahead and teach our kids to make better decisions than that". Your mileage may vary, however.
 
Stee6043 said:
It seems difficult for some to distinguish between having the right to do something vs making sound decisions.

You are within your rights to drink a fifth of vodka each morning, smoke 12 packs of sigs each afternoon. Just like Kyle was within his rights to carry that AR up to WI. I put both of those two examples into the same bucket of "lets go ahead and teach our kids to make better decisions than that". Your mileage may vary, however.
Click to expand...

that’s a cool story. However, you didn’t ACTUALLY answer a single one of my questions despite responding specifically to my post…..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
113,154
Messages
1,427,352
Members
61,060
Latest member
Danileo
Back
Top