You do mean the witnesses who would describe the investigation into Hunter Biden, right?
That’s not evidence. It didn’t happen. Don’t you know anything?
No. It's both side get the same rules. Right now, Republicans have different rules than Democrats. As you may recall, the impeachment was about Joe and Hunter Biden and the President's claims of their corruption. We where told it was "debunked," not true, and the President was impeached. Come to find out a few weeks after the election the DOJ had a fkg formal investigation into Hunter Biden. WTF is that -- they let a President get impeached while they investigated a person at the center of the President's claims. It's total BS and if you can't see it, then I am truly sorry for you.
The observers seemed to have incorrectly assumed that counting was over for the night since they saw workers leaving (ones whose job, opening envelopes, actually was done). The Georgia requirement is for partisan observers to be allowed to watch but if there aren't any, the process doesn't stop. It would be ludicrous to do so since there are sites that gather no partisan observers. Also, of course the scene was under video surveillance.
If Trump had done what he promised more people might have voted for him but I'm glad to see him go, he's been a horrible president. Just because the guy you backed lost badly is no excuse to go off on a rant calling people names. It was your vote to do what you wanted just as it was my vote to do what I wanted. I said 2 years ago why Trump wouldn't win. He never cared about the country he just wanted the status symbol and to play golf.
DOJ has a policy to not comment on investigations in progress in the run-up to elections. That rule was broken in 2016, apparently to the detriment of the Democratic candidate. Apparently AG Barr, to his credit, resolved to follow the rules this time. As far as we know, there are investigations in progress that would have harmed other candidates, only time will tell.
Video surveillance of people doing their job is better than standing 6' back and watching you can play it back and use it for evidence but the video showed no wrong doing but we do have a lot of whiney losers on here today.
First, the impeachment was before Biden was even the nominee. So there was penty of time to reveal the investigatin before the Presidential race. Second, the DOJ leaks like a sieve when in wants to. Third, the "rule" is BS. We voters have a right to know if candidates or their close relatives are under investigation. The only way you'll stop corruption is to stop electing the coruptors. Release the information and let the people decide.
Turns out there could have been the evidentiary hearing in this case you are pining for but the plaintiffs blew it - some say on purpose. Here's an excerpt from the dismissal:
We see these statistics but never hear of anyone being held accountable for the infractions. Has anyone ever heard of a single voter that cast an illegal vote given so much as a citation for the infraction? Why have laws on the books that are realistically unenforceable? If indeed these votes were identified as being fraudulent, then the voters that were involved need to at the very least be barred from registering to vote for life. It should be one of the simplest of protocols to set up in the registry system. They simply get removed from the roles so they don't get sent any voting materials and their name is on the list in red as unqualified if they happen to check-in at a polling place. Oh yeah but we would have to be able to check IDs and that would be unfair, I forgot.
There are a smattering of low level punishments.
LMAO signed trade deals that were so bad Trump put a tarrif on Canadian aluminum the same week he signed the same NFTA deal. He got less than 2% more for dairy farmers and Wisconsin farmers are now saying they are worse off, the art of the deal lol.
