SCOTUS reject Texas

Iprof

Iprof

Well-Known Member
TECHNICAL Contributor
Aug 8, 2008
2,985
Lake Huron
Boat Info
A 300 DA 4kw Gen-set, central vac, electric head, windlass, AC/reverse heat, Lowrance 522ci GPS Char
Engines
twin 5.7 with Alpha drives
The SCOTUS has rejected Texas lawsuit to block the ballots of millions of people. Monday the Electoral College will cast 306 votes for President Elect Joe Biden.
This final defeat will hopefully end Trumps assult on the 2020 election.
 
Maggieiscrazy said:
Congratulations. The democrats were successful at fraudulently stealing the election. I hope you’re proud.
Click to expand...
According to 55 lawsuits and many many recounts it was a fair election and Joe Biden won. Not one court case showed it was not a fair election. You will have 4 years to get over the results.
I am very happy with the results.
 
Maggieiscrazy said:
Congratulations. The democrats were successful at fraudulently stealing the election. I hope you’re proud.
Click to expand...

is that what happened? Ok, well I’m going to head on back over to reality and sanity. Take care then.
 
Iprof said:
And I'm a registered Republican what's your point.
Click to expand...
You voted for Biden. You are not a Republican. You reap what you sow. If you think the next four years under Harris will be good for the country, then good luck to you. #notmypresident #resist
 
Golfman25 said:
You voted for Biden. You are not a Republican. You reap what you sow. If you think the next four years under Harris will be good for the country, then good luck to you. #notmypresident #resist
Click to expand...
Of course Biden will be our President on January 20 2021. I will judge his Presidency the same way I judged Trumps. I supported Trump but after 1 year that changed to buyers remorse. Only time will tell but I'm willing to wait and see.
 
Maggieiscrazy said:
Congratulations. The democrats were successful at fraudulently stealing the election. I hope you’re proud.
Click to expand...
If I made such a statement I would make sure I had some proof! Do you offer ANY proof or just conspiracies? I know you don't have any evidence because I am sure it would have been presented it in one of the many court cases that were denied?
 
Iprof said:
Of course Biden will be our President on January 20 2021. I will judge his Presidency the same way I judged Trumps. I supported Trump but after 1 year that changed to buyers remorse. Only time will tell but I'm willing to wait and see.
Click to expand...
Proof you're not a Republican. All Trump did was push classic Republican policies and enacted many of them eaither via legislation or executive order. Just because he was a little rough around the edges and not "Presidential" enough for you, you bailed and voted for a socialist agenda. Smart, real smart. There will be no going back from the socialist havoc Biden and Harris will unleash on this country. But hell, my kid's student loans will be repaid. Hope you're happy.
 
Golfman25 said:
Proof you're not a Republican. All Trump did was push classic Republican policies and enacted many of them eaither via legislation or executive order. Just because he was a little rough around the edges and not "Presidential" enough for you, you bailed and voted for a socialist agenda. Smart, real smart. There will be no going back from the socialist havoc Biden and Harris will unleash on this country. But hell, my kid's student loans will be repaid. Hope you're happy.
Click to expand...

Do you even listen to yourself? Hasn’t States Rights been a cornerstone of Republican philosophy? It was after all the rationale for putting the COVID response in the hands of the governors. What does it say about States Rights when a Republican AG from a Republican state sues another State over its internal governing policies and asks for SCOTUS to referee? It’s says to me States Rights is being thrown out the window just to soothe the ego of someone who can’t accept the fact he lost.
 
West Coast said:
If I made such a statement I would make sure I had some proof! Do you offer ANY proof or just conspiracies? I know you don't have any evidence because I am sure it would have been presented it in one of the many court cases that were denied?
Click to expand...
If the court would take them. Unlike the three years of pee pee tapes, there are 100s of actual sworn in notarized affidavits. Then you look at cities like Chicago, Minneapolis, St Louis, etc. all had less votes for Biden than Hillary in 2016. However, when the tallying suddenly stopped in the swing states where Joe was getting his ass kicked, he miraculously came ahead, breaking records, while House republicans were nominated. Sounds completely legit.....o_O
if Democrats weren’t so worried, they would be pushing to demonstrate there was no fraud by auditing the election and thoroughly vet the affidavits. Instead, they’re lawyering up, trying to erase Dominion machines, and fighting to not look at cases. Makes perfect sense when you have nothing to hide.
Then there’s the constitutionality of it all, changing how to vote days before an election without the legislature....but yeah, nothing to see here.
 
Henry Boyd said:
Do you even listen to yourself? Hasn’t States Rights been a cornerstone of Republican philosophy? It was after all the rationale for putting the COVID response in the hands of the governors. What does it say about States Rights when a Republican AG from a Republican state sues another State over its internal governing policies and asks for SCOTUS to referee? It’s says to me States Rights is being thrown out the window just to soothe the ego of someone who can’t accept the fact he lost.
Click to expand...
Sorry Charlie, States rights are subject to a little thing called The Constitution.

Of course the guy you voted for wants to git rid of not only states rights, but indiviual rights and mandate everyone wear underwear on their face.
 
OllieC said:
If the court would take them. Unlike the three years of pee pee tapes, there are 100s of actual sworn in notarized affidavits. Then you look at cities like Chicago, Minneapolis, St Louis, etc. all had less votes for Biden than Hillary in 2016. However, when the tallying suddenly stopped in the swing states where Joe was getting his ass kicked, he miraculously came ahead, breaking records, while House republicans were nominated. Sounds completely legit.....o_O
if Democrats weren’t so worried, they would be pushing to demonstrate there was no fraud by auditing the election and thoroughly vet the affidavits. Instead, they’re lawyering up, trying to erase Dominion machines, and fighting to not look at cases. Makes perfect sense when you have nothing to hide.
Then there’s the constitutionality of it all, changing how to vote days before an election without the legislature....but yeah, nothing to see here.
Click to expand...
Look most people don't understand the difference between a statistically anomolly and an explination for said anomolly. The stats tell you what is "supposed" to happen. If it doesn't then it is more than fair to question "why didn't the stats hold?" When Repubicans ask that question, they get stonewalled with BS answers and told "you have no proof." But the facts are facts -- Democrats cheat better than Republicans. Always have, always will.
 
Golfman25 said:
Sorry Charlie, States rights are subject to a little thing called The Constitution.

Of course the guy you voted for wants to git rid of not only states rights, but indiviual rights and mandate everyone wear underwear on their face.
Click to expand...

Still not listening to yourself, and you clearly did not listen in high school civics class, nor American history. States Rights means the neither the Federal Government, nor other states, can meddle in the internal workings of another state.

And in point of fact, SCOTUS upheld the notion of States Rights by rejecting the Texas claim on the grounds that Texas had no standing (aka none of their damn business) for its suit, besides offering nothing in the way of supporting facts.
 
Maggieiscrazy said:
Congratulations. The democrats were successful at fraudulently stealing the election. I hope you’re proud.
Click to expand...

so you are saying all courts up to the scotus are involved in the vote steal ? it gets more and more funny .
 
Golfman25 said:
Look most people don't understand the difference between a statistically anomolly and an explination for said anomolly. The stats tell you what is "supposed" to happen. If it doesn't then it is more than fair to question "why didn't the stats hold?" When Repubicans ask that question, they get stonewalled with BS answers and told "you have no proof." But the facts are facts -- Democrats cheat better than Republicans. Always have, always will.
Click to expand...
Try googling "one in a quadrillion". You will get lots of detailed explanations of the flaws in the "statistically anomally" arguments, both in the media but also in math and OR forums, which don't seem to be partisan.
If cheating by Democrats (or Republicans) were known to be facts, all these cases would have been super simple to win - what happened?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
113,153
Messages
1,427,342
Members
61,060
Latest member
Danileo
Back
Top