Recent content by ClarkGriswold

I’m not prosecuting(and certainly not persecuting) the case. Just showing “retainer agreements” ARE a thing whether you use them or not. I respect your perspective, however.

Which would be relevant in another thread not about Trump.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/retainer_agreement

Mitt, saying what everyone is thinking... Romney: I think everybody has made their own assessment of President Trump's character, and so far as I know you don't pay someone $130,000 not to have sex with you.

I guess we will need to listen and find out?

I see that FPOTUS called on you all to go protest outside his trial. Who is going?? @Flyer5 you heading down there?

In court papers, prosecutors say that Trump tried to stall the Daniels payoff “for as long as possible”. Trump told Cohen that if he could delay the exchange until after the election, they might be able to avoid giving her any money, “because at that point it would not matter if the story became...

I am not saying it. The DA is saying it. The allegation is that there was no retainer attached to said payments, as claimed. Prosecutors charge that Cohen wired $130,000 to Daniels’ then attorney just 12 days before the presidential election. Cohen funneled the money by making the payoff...

Yes, of course the NDA is legal. Not the issue. Maybe you should start listening to the coverage. The question is if the payments and the falsifying of documents violated election finance law, as I posted earlier. I don't know the answer, which is why I am listening.

HYPOTHETICAL: If Biden had his lawyer pay off someone to cover up Hunters laptop and then falsified accounting records to cover it up during the election run-up as "legal expenses", would that be a crime, in your estimation?

In the run-up to an election? You tell me.

Ah. Forgot you are a lawyer and a CFO.

Did Jesse just describe the crime?

I guess we will find out. Are you listening to coverage today?

My kid is doing fine too, thanks.