Considering a 2000 Sundancer 400

This is probably a straight forward question for most of you. I am having a tough time getting straight info on the LOA of the 1998 Sundancer 400. I see 41'6" on paper, but when I talked to the seller he says 46'. Another seller stated 44'. Can someone shed some light on this? Thanks
 
Yes, my 2003 410DA is 45' 6" LOA. The 1998 400DA is 44' 4" with the swim platform.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    20.6 KB · Views: 324
Last edited:
I bought a 1998 400 Sundancer with Diesel's last year and my wife and I love it. It's a great boat with lots of room, You'll really enjoy it this summer. If you go to the Sea Ray website under model archives, click on spec sheets and you'll be able to access information on your boat.
 
I bought a 1998 400 Sundancer with Diesel's last year and my wife and I love it. It's a great boat with lots of room, You'll really enjoy it this summer. If you go to the Sea Ray website under model archives, click on spec sheets and you'll be able to access information on your boat.

Thanks. Good to know. We will be in Tawas for the season if you ever decide to make a trip up north let me know.
 
I need to pick the forum's brain one more time. We have completed the out of water survey on the 98 DA 400. In general it went very well. Above average in essentially all areas. There were two areas of concern that I would like input on. First, there were several areas below water line that registered low to slightly more than low areas of moisture. The surveyor was not concerned with this. My question is if this is actually acceptable? This is April, and the boat has been in heated storage since last fall. Second issue: Initially the surveyor felt there was a 12" x 18" area of delamination on the hull. He revisited the boat with a fiberglass specialist. He is revising his report to state the area is actually a 4 inch diameter area of delamination. His thought is that this does not need repair at this time, and that it should just be monitored on an annual basis. Seems like a risk for me, and a possible issue for the boat. The plan is to launch within the week and then complete a sea trial. I am not sure that should be the plan if this is something that is unacceptable. Any input would be appreciated.
 
Would it make sense to have the fiberglass specialist quote the cost of repair for the area of delamination and then use this quote to negotiate? If it can be repaired (with confidence) and you can get the cost covered in the deal I wouldn't consider this to be a deal breaker. My two cents only...
 
I need to pick the forum's brain one more time. We have completed the out of water survey on the 98 DA 400. In general it went very well. Above average in essentially all areas. There were two areas of concern that I would like input on. First, there were several areas below water line that registered low to slightly more than low areas of moisture. The surveyor was not concerned with this. My question is if this is actually acceptable? This is April, and the boat has been in heated storage since last fall. Second issue: Initially the surveyor felt there was a 12" x 18" area of delamination on the hull. He revisited the boat with a fiberglass specialist. He is revising his report to state the area is actually a 4 inch diameter area of delamination. His thought is that this does not need repair at this time, and that it should just be monitored on an annual basis. Seems like a risk for me, and a possible issue for the boat. The plan is to launch within the week and then complete a sea trial. I am not sure that should be the plan if this is something that is unacceptable. Any input would be appreciated.

Whatever you decide, St.Clair fiberglass behind West Marine on North River and Chart is who you want to talk to. Ask for Dan. I would avoid Bay Harbor in Belle Maer.
 
Specifically where are those areas?
Transom, stringers, and deck are areas that concern me; only in that they are difficult and costly to repair.
If the surveyor isn't concerned then agree not a deal breaker by any means.
 
Hull moisture detected on both sides from the stern 5-6 feet forward at and below water line. It was noted to be low on the port side and slightly higher on the starboard side. Not sure if this is appropriate given that the boat has been in heated storage (surveyor doesn't seem too concerned). The delamination was noted on the port bottom. It is noted to be 4-5 inches in diameter aft of the inboard lifting strake. They are recommending annual monitoring only, and no repair necessary at this time. Open to your thoughts. Thanks
 
How old is the boat?? Sounds like this are not major concerns. As stated, stringers and deck areas would be more of a concern. If the surveyor did percussion sounds and the areas have strong report, then do not worry. Just make sure any thru holes are sealed up.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
18 year old boat with those issues. That's why the surveyor is not flinching.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Thanks for everyone's input. The area of delamination was evaluated further and corrected. Once sanded down it did not appear to be an real issue. ON TO THE SEA TRAIL!!
 

Forum statistics

Threads
112,950
Messages
1,422,862
Members
60,932
Latest member
juliediane
Back
Top